Flipping for success: evaluating the effectiveness of a novel teaching approach in a graduate level setting
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 28 February 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Medical Education
- Vol. 15 (1), 1-10
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0317-2
Abstract
Flipped Classroom is a model that’s quickly gaining recognition as a novel teaching approach among health science curricula. The purpose of this study was four-fold and aimed to compare Flipped Classroom effectiveness ratings with: 1) student socio-demographic characteristics, 2) student final grades, 3) student overall course satisfaction, and 4) course pre-Flipped Classroom effectiveness ratings. The participants in the study consisted of 67 Masters-level graduate students in an introductory epidemiology class. Data was collected from students who completed surveys during three time points (beginning, middle and end) in each term. The Flipped Classroom was employed for the academic year 2012–2013 (two terms) using both pre-class activities and in-class activities. Among the 67 Masters-level graduate students, 80% found the Flipped Classroom model to be either somewhat effective or very effective (M = 4.1/5.0). International students rated the Flipped Classroom to be significantly more effective when compared to North American students (X2 = 11.35, p < 0.05). Students’ perceived effectiveness of the Flipped Classroom had no significant association to their academic performance in the course as measured by their final grades (rs = 0.70). However, students who found the Flipped Classroom to be effective were also more likely to be satisfied with their course experience. Additionally, it was found that the SEEQ variable scores for students enrolled in the Flipped Classroom were significantly higher than the ones for students enrolled prior to the implementation of the Flipped Classroom (p = 0.003). Overall, the format of the Flipped Classroom provided more opportunities for students to engage in critical thinking, independently facilitate their own learning, and more effectively interact with and learn from their peers. Additionally, the instructor was given more flexibility to cover a wider range and depth of material, provide in-class applied learning opportunities based on problem-solving activities and offer timely feedback/guidance to students. Yet in our study, this teaching style had its fair share of challenges, which were largely dependent on the use and management of technology. Despite these challenges, the Flipped Classroom proved to be a novel and effective teaching approach at the graduate level setting.This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is FLIP enough? Or should we use the FLIPPED model instead?Computers & Education, 2014
- How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientationLearning Environments Research, 2012
- Lecture Halls without Lectures — A Proposal for Medical EducationThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2012
- Preparing Medical Students for the Continual Improvement of Health and Health Care: Abraham Flexner and the New “Public Interest”Academic Medicine, 2010
- Social Learning Theory and Web-Based Learning Environments: A Review of Research and Discussion of ImplicationsAmerican Journal of Distance Education, 2009
- Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the ResearchJournal of Engineering Education, 2004
- Student Ratings: Validity, Utility, and ControversyNew Directions for Institutional Research, 2001
- SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIVIST PERSPECTIVES ON TEACHING AND LEARNINGAnnual Review of Psychology, 1998
- Validity concerns and usefulness of student ratings of instruction.American Psychologist, 1997
- SEEQ: A RELIABLE, VALID, AND USEFUL INSTRUMENT FOR COLLECTING STUDENTS' EVALUATIONS OF UNIVERSITY TEACHINGBritish Journal of Educational Psychology, 1982