Teaching Delivery of Bad News Using Experiential Sessions With Standardized Patients
- 1 July 2002
- journal article
- Published by Informa UK Limited in Teaching and Learning in Medicine
- Vol. 14 (3), 144-149
- https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328015tlm1403_2
Abstract
Delivering bad news is a difficult task that is important to address in medical education. This study evaluated the impact of an experiential educational intervention using multiple standardized patient scenarios on medical students' comfort with delivering difficult news. In small groups, 3rd-year medical students practiced communicating bad news within the context of five different patient scenarios. During 1999 and 2000, surveys were administered to 341 students before and 4 weeks and 1 year after the program. Students rated comfort level in discussing bad news, terminal illness, hospice, and dying with patients. A significant one standard deviation change was observed in students' self-reported comfort in communicating bad news after the educational program. The intervention was highly rated, especially the encounters with standardized patients and observation of others. Experiential education using multiple standardized patient scenarios is a successful model for increasing student comfort in responding to difficult clinical communication tasks.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Communication skills training in oncologyCancer, 1999
- Breaking bad newsEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncology, 1998
- Improving fourth-year studentsʼ complex interviewing skillsAcademic Medicine, 1998
- Things to consider when teaching doctors how to deliver good, bad and sad newsMedical Teacher, 1996
- Evaluation of a breaking bad news course for medical studentsMedical Education, 1995
- Giving sad and bad newsThe Lancet, 1993
- The meaning of bad news in HIV disease: Counselling about dreaded issues revisitedCounselling Psychology Quarterly, 1993
- How To Break Bad NewsPublished by University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) ,1992
- Bad news: delivery, dialogue, and dilemmasArchives of Internal Medicine, 1991