Advantages of the nested case-control design in diagnostic research
Open Access
- 21 July 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Vol. 8 (1), 48-7
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-48
Abstract
Background Despite its benefits, it is uncommon to apply the nested case-control design in diagnostic research. We aim to show advantages of this design for diagnostic accuracy studies. Methods We used data from a full cross-sectional diagnostic study comprising a cohort of 1295 consecutive patients who were selected on their suspicion of having deep vein thrombosis (DVT). We draw nested case-control samples from the full study population with case:control ratios of 1:1, 1:2, 1:3 and 1:4 (per ratio 100 samples were taken). We calculated diagnostic accuracy estimates for two tests that are used to detect DVT in clinical practice. Results Estimates of diagnostic accuracy in the nested case-control samples were very similar to those in the full study population. For example, for each case:control ratio, the positive predictive value of the D-dimer test was 0.30 in the full study population and 0.30 in the nested case-control samples (median of the 100 samples). As expected, variability of the estimates decreased with increasing sample size. Conclusion Our findings support the view that the nested case-control study is a valid and efficient design for diagnostic studies and should also be (re)appraised in current guidelines on diagnostic accuracy research.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studiesCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2006
- Limited value of patient history and physical examination in diagnosing deep vein thrombosis in primary careFamily Practice, 2004
- Assessment of the accuracy of diagnostic tests: the cross-sectional studyJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2003
- The nested case-control study in cardiologyAmerican Heart Journal, 2003
- Diagnostic research on routine care data: Prospects and problemsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2003
- Evidence base of clinical diagnosis: Evaluation of diagnostic proceduresBMJ, 2002
- Problems in selecting the adequate patient population from existing data files for assessment studies of new diagnostic testsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1995
- Nested Case-Control StudiesPreventive Medicine, 1994
- The influence of referral patterns on the characteristics of diagnostic testsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1992
- Problems of Spectrum and Bias in Evaluating the Efficacy of Diagnostic TestsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978