Motor-sparing effect of iPACK (interspace between the popliteal artery and capsule of the posterior knee) block versus tibial nerve block after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial
- 1 April 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
- Vol. 45 (4), 267-276
- https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2019-100895
Abstract
Background and objective An ultrasound-guided anesthetic technique targeting the interspace between the popliteal artery and capsule of the posterior knee (iPACK) can provide posterior knee analgesia with preserved motor function after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study compared the peroneal nerve motor-sparing effects of iPACK block and tibial nerve block (TNB) when combined with local infiltration analgesia (LIA) and continuous adductor canal block (CACB). Methods In this study, 105 patients scheduled for elective TKA were randomized to receive proximal iPACK block (iPACK1), distal iPACK block (iPACK2), or TNB, along with spinal anesthesia, modified LIA, and CACB. The primary outcome was the incidence of common peroneal nerve (CPN) motor blockade. Secondary outcomes included CPN sensory function, tibial sensorimotor function, posterior knee pain, pain score, intravenous morphine requirement, timed up-and-go test, quadriceps muscle strength, range of motion, length of hospital stay, patient satisfaction, and adverse events. Results The incidence of CPN motor blockade was significantly higher in the TNB group than in the iPACK1 (p=0.001) and iPACK2 (p=0.001) groups, but was not significant between the iPACK1 and iPACK2 groups (p=0.76). Tibial nerve motor function was more preserved in the iPACK1 and iPACK2 groups than in the TNB group (p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). Complete CPN and tibial sensorimotor blockade were not observed in the iPACK2 group. Posterior knee pain score was significantly higher in the iPACK1 group than in other groups during the 24-hour postoperative period (p=0.001). Conclusions Compared with TNB, iPACK1 and iPACK2 preserved CPN and tibial nerve motor function to a greater extent. However, iPACK2 did not demonstrate complete CPN and tibial nerve motor blockade while maintaining effective posterior knee pain relief.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical evidence of traditional vs fast track recovery methodologies after total arthroplasty for osteoarthritic knee treatment. A retrospective observational studyMuscle Ligaments and Tendons Journal, 2019
- Fast-track total knee arthroplasty improved clinical and functional outcome in the first 7 days after surgery: a randomized controlled pilot study with 5-year follow-upArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2018
- Comparison of local infiltration analgesia and sciatic nerve block for pain control after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysisJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 2017
- Anatomic and Ultrasonographic Evaluation of the Knee Sensory InnervationRegional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, 2017
- Is sciatic nerve block advantageous when combined with femoral nerve block for postoperative analgesia following total knee arthroplasty? a meta-analysisCanadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 2016
- Innervation of the Anterior Capsule of the Human KneeRegional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, 2015
- The Analgesic Effects of Proximal, Distal, or No Sciatic Nerve Block on Posterior Knee Pain after Total Knee ArthroplastyAnesthesiology, 2014
- Analgesia after total knee replacement: local infiltration versus epidural combined with a femoral nerve blockadeThe Bone & Joint Journal, 2013
- Why still in hospital after fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty?Acta Orthopaedica, 2011
- Local infiltration analgesia: a technique for the control of acute postoperative pain following knee and hip surgery: A case study of 325 patientsActa Orthopaedica, 2008