Digital Mammography: Effects of Reduced Radiation Dose on Diagnostic Performance
- 1 May 2007
- journal article
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology
- Vol. 243 (2), 396-404
- https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2432061065
Abstract
To experimentally determine the relationship between radiation dose and observer accuracy in the detection and discrimination of simulated lesions for digital mammography. This HIPAA-compliant study received institutional review board approval; the informed consent requirement was waived. Three hundred normal craniocaudal images were selected from an existing database of digital mammograms. Simulated mammographic lesions that mimicked benign and malignant masses and clusters of microcalcifications (3.3-7.4 cm in diameter) were then superimposed on images. Images were rendered without and with added radiographic noise to simulate effects of reducing the radiation dose to one half and one quarter of the clinical dose. Images were read by five experienced breast imaging radiologists. Results were analyzed to determine effects of reduced dose on overall interpretation accuracy, detection of microcalcifications and masses, discrimination between benign and malignant masses, and interpretation time. Overall accuracy decreased from 0.83 with full dose to 0.78 and 0.62 with half and quarter doses, respectively. The decrease associated with transition from full dose to quarter dose was significant (P < .01), primarily because of an effect on detection of microcalcifications (P < .01) and discrimination of masses (P < .05). The level of dose reduction did not significantly affect detection of malignant masses (P > .5). However, reduced dose resulted in an increased mean interpretation time per image by 28% (P < .0001). These findings suggest that dose reduction in digital mammography has a measurable but modest effect on diagnostic accuracy. The small magnitude of the effect in response to the drastic reduction of dose suggests potential for modest dose reductions in digital mammography.This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Simulation of Mammographic LesionsAcademic Radiology, 2006
- Diagnostic Performance of Digital versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer ScreeningThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Digital mammography: current state and future aspectsEuropean Radiology, 2005
- Detectors for digital mammography.Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment, 2004
- The current status of digital mammographyClinical Radiology, 2004
- An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systemsMedical Physics, 2003
- Update on Digital MammographyBreast Disease, 2001
- Scatter/primary in mammography: Comprehensive resultsMedical Physics, 2000
- SCREEN-FILM AND DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY: Image Quality and Radiation Dose ConsiderationsRadiologic Clinics of North America, 2000
- Detection of Subtle Lung Nodules: Relative Influence of Quantum and Anatomic Noise on Chest RadiographsRadiology, 1999