Simulating chemistry–aerosol–cloud–radiation–climate feedbacks over the continental U.S. using the online-coupled Weather Research Forecasting Model with chemistry (WRF/Chem)
- 16 June 2010
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Atmospheric Environment
- Vol. 44 (29), 3568-3582
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.05.056
Abstract
The chemistry–aerosol–cloud–radiation–climate feedbacks are simulated using WRF/Chem over the continental U.S. in January and July 2001. Aerosols can reduce incoming solar radiation by up to −9% in January and −16% in July and 2-m temperatures by up to 0.16 °C in January and 0.37 °C in July over most of the continental U.S. The NO2 photolysis rates decrease in July by up to −8% over the central and eastern U.S. where aerosol concentrations are high but increase by up to 7% over the western U.S. in July and up to 13% over the entire domain in January. Planetary boundary layer (PBL) height reduces by up to −23% in January and −24% in July. Temperatures and wind speeds in July in big cities such as Atlanta and New York City reduce at/near surface but increase at higher altitudes. The changes in PBL height, temperatures, and wind speed indicate a more stable atmospheric stability of the PBL and further exacerbate air pollution over areas where air pollution is already severe. Aerosols can increase cloud optical depths in big cities in July, and can lead to 500–5000 cm−3 cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) at a supersaturation of 1% over most land areas and 10–500 cm−3 CCN over ocean in both months with higher values over most areas in July than in January, particularly in the eastern U.S. The total column cloud droplet number concentrations are up to 4.9 × 106 cm−2 in January and up to 11.8 × 106 cm−2 in July, with higher values over regions with high CCN concentrations and sufficient cloud coverage. Aerosols can reduce daily precipitation by up to 1.1 mm day−1 in January and 19.4 mm day−1 in July thus the wet removal rates over most of the land areas due to the formation of small CCNs, but they can increase precipitation over regions with the formation of large/giant CCN. These results indicate potential importance of the aerosol feedbacks and an urgent need for their accurate representations in current atmospheric models to reduce uncertainties associated with climate change predictions.Keywords
This publication has 66 references indexed in Scilit:
- Coupling aerosol-cloud-radiative processes in the WRF-Chem model: Investigating the radiative impact of elevated point sourcesAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2009
- Midweek increase in U.S. summer rain and storm heights suggests air pollution invigorates rainstormsJournal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2008
- Implementation of Noah land surface model advances in the National Centers for Environmental Prediction operational mesoscale Eta modelJournal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2003
- A parameterization of aerosol activation 3. Sectional representationJournal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2002
- A One-dimensional Time Dependent Cloud ModelJournal of the Meteorological Society of Japan. Ser. II, 2002
- Optimizing model performance: variable size resolution in cloud chemistry modelingAtmospheric Environment, 2001
- Coupling an Advanced Land Surface–Hydrology Model with the Penn State–NCAR MM5 Modeling System. Part I: Model Implementation and SensitivityMonthly Weather Review, 2001
- Weekly cycles of air pollutants, precipitation and tropical cyclones in the coastal NW Atlantic regionNature, 1998
- A Model of the Effect of Aerosols on Urban Climates with Particular Applications to the Los Angeles BasinJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 1977
- Particle Emissions From a Large Kraft Paper Mill and Their Effects on the Microstructure of Warm CloudsJournal of Applied Meteorology, 1974