ASSESSMENT OF HUMAN SPERM MORPHOLOGY BY STRICT CRITERIA: COMPARISON OF WET PREPARATION VERSUS STAINED WITH THE MODIFIED DIFF-QUIK METHOD
- 1 January 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Archives of Andrology
- Vol. 48 (4), 307-314
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01485010290031628
Abstract
Routine semen examination remains an important tool for the diagnosis and treatment in human subfertility. Of all semen parameters, sperm morphology seems to be one of the most powerful indicators of a man's fertilizing potential in vitro and in vivo. Lack of standardization of sperm morphology assessments remains the main reason for the usefulness of this parameter. The aim of this study was to analyze the agreement between the wet-stained preparations versus those stained with modified Diff-Quik for sperm morphology. A total of 100 unselected semen samples from infertile couples were analyzed. Sperm morphology was evaluated with unstained specimens and following modified Diff-Quik staining according to the strict (Kruger classification) criteria by two different examiners (intralaboratory blind assessment). Mean percentages of morphologically normal spermatozoa were identical on wet and stained preparation slides (4.79 vs. 4.61, p >.05). Wide divergence of results was found with respect to the percentage of sperm with head and midpiece defects with the two different preparations (p >.001). The percentage of sperm tail defects was similar in both methods (p >.05). Simple linear regression analysis between the two methods revealed very good correlation for the morphologically normal spermatozoa (r =.83), but poor correlation for the sperm head, midpiece, and tail defects (r =.25,.25, and.28, respectively). Wet preparation is suitable only for the morphologically normal spermatozoa, but to determine the percentage of the defective spermatozoa, staining the smear is recommended.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of different staining and washing procedures on the results of human sperm morphology evaluation by manual and computerised methodsAndrologia, 2009
- Intra- and inter-laboratory variability in the assessment of sperm morphology by strict criteria: impact of semen preparation, staining techniques and manual versus computerized analysisHuman Reproduction, 1999
- Exercise and reproductive dysfunctionFertility and Sterility, 1999
- A logistic regression model including DNA status and morphology of spermatozoa for prediction of fertilization in vitro.Human Reproduction, 1998
- Sperm morphology assessment: diagnostic potential and comparitive analysis of strict or WHO criteria in a fertile and a subfertile populationInternational Journal of Andrology, 1998
- Predictive value of sperm morphology and movement characteristics in the outcome of in vitro fertilization of human oocytesJournal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 1989
- Sperm Morphology: Unstained and Stained Smears in Fertile and Infertile MenArchives of Andrology, 1989
- Predictive value of abnormal sperm morphology in in vitro fertilizationFertility and Sterility, 1988
- New method of evaluating sperm morphology with predictive value for human in vitro fertilizationUrology, 1987
- Sperm morphologic features as a prognostic factor in in vitro fertilizationFertility and Sterility, 1986