The role of audit committees in managing relationships with external auditors after SOX
- 17 April 2009
- journal article
- Published by Emerald in Managerial Auditing Journal
- Vol. 24 (4), 368-397
- https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900910948206
Abstract
Purpose – Recent US reforms aimed at strengthening audit committees and their structure grant independent audit committees the responsibility to appoint, dismiss, and compensate auditors. The purpose of this paper is to examine the association between audit committee characteristics and auditors' compensation and dismissals following the enactment of the Sarbanes Oxley Act (SOX). Design/methodology/approach – A series of linear and logistic regression models were employed in a unique sample comprising of 2,393 observations. Findings – It was observed that stronger audit committees demand a higher level of assurance and are less likely to dismiss their auditors. Further, an increase was found in auditor independence as measured by reduced board involvement and less dismissals following an unfavorable audit opinion. Overall results suggest that increased audit committee roles and independence after SOX contribute to auditor independence and audit quality. Practical implications – This research has implications for regulators, auditors, boards and academics. The paper highlights that although all audit committees had to improve as a result of SOX, the remaining variation in audit committee characteristics continue to be important to the demand for auditor and audit quality. Originality/value – This study is the first to consider the association between audit committee characteristics and its extended responsibilities after SOX.Keywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does the SOX Definition of an Accounting Expert Matter? The Association between Audit Committee Directors' Accounting Expertise and Accounting Conservatism*Contemporary Accounting Research, 2008
- The Role of Risk Management and Governance in Determining Audit DemandJournal of Business Finance & Accounting, 2006
- Audit Committee Financial Expertise, Corporate Governance and Accruals Quality: An Empirical AnalysisSSRN Electronic Journal, 2006
- Audit Committee Financial Expertise, Competing Corporate Governance Mechanisms, and Earnings ManagementSSRN Electronic Journal, 2006
- Does the Market Value Financial Expertise on Audit Committees of Boards of Directors?Journal of Accounting Research, 2005
- An Empirical Investigation of Audit Fees, Nonaudit Fees, and Audit Committees*Contemporary Accounting Research, 2003
- Audit Committee Characteristics and the Perceived Quality of Financial Reporting: An Empirical AnalysisSSRN Electronic Journal, 2003
- The Relation Between Auditors' Fees for Non-Audit Services and Earnings ManagementSSRN Electronic Journal, 2002
- Board characteristics and audit pricing post-Cadbury: a research noteEuropean Accounting Review, 1999
- The Provision of Nonaudit Services by Accounting Firms to their Audit Clients*Contemporary Accounting Research, 1997