Analysing the benefits of laparoscopic hernia repair compared to open repair: A meta-analysis of observational studies
Open Access
- 1 January 2012
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Medknow in Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
- Vol. 8 (4), 111-7
- https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.103107
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study is to compare the difference of incidence of post-operative complications, operative time, length of stay and recurrence of patients undergoing laparoscopic or open repair of their ventral/incisional hernia a meta-analytic technique for observational studies. Materials and Methods: A literature search was performed using Medline, PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases for studies reported between 1998 and 2009 comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for the treatment of ventral (incisional) hernia. This meta-analysis of all the observational studies compared the post-operative complications recurrence rate and length of stay. The random effects model was used. Sensitivity and heterogeneity were analysed. Results: Analysis of 15 observational studies comprising 2452 patients qualified for meta-analysis according to the study's inclusion criteria. Laparoscopic surgery was attempted in 1067 out of 2452. The results showed that the length of stay (odds ratio [OR], − 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], − 1.09 to − 0.91; P < 0.00001) and operative time (OR, 59.33; 95% CI, 58.55 to 60.11; P < 0.00001) was significantly lower in the laparoscopic group. The results also showed that there was a significant reduction in the formation of abscesses (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.92; P = 0.03) and wound infections (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.82; P = 0.007) post-operatively. There is a trend which indicates that the recurrence of the hernia using laparoscopic repair versus open repair was overall lower with the laparoscopic repair (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.22 to 1.04; P = 0.06), however, this was not significant. Conclusion: Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair was associated with a reduced length of stay, operative time and lower incidence of abscess and wound infection post-operatively. This study also highlights the benefit of using observational studies as a form of research and its value as a tool in answering questions where large sample sizes of patient groups would be impossible to accumulate in a reasonable length of time.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair is Safer than Open Repair: Analysis of the NSQIP DataJournal of Surgical Research, 2009
- Laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia mesh repair: a prospective studySurgical Endoscopy, 2006
- Systematic review of publication bias in studies on publication biasBMJ, 2005
- A prospective study comparing the complication rates between laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairsSurgical Endoscopy, 2003
- Incisional hernia repairSurgical Endoscopy, 2003
- Randomised controlled trials in primary care: scope and application.2002
- Five-Year Follow-Up of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic or Open Groin Hernia RepairAnnals of Surgery, 2002
- Mesh repair of incisional Hernia: Comparison of Laparoscopic and open repairThe European Journal of Surgery, 2002
- Effect of arterial revascularisation on survival: a systematic review of studies comparing bilateral and single internal mammary arteriesThe Lancet, 2001
- Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Ventral HerniorrhaphyThe American Surgeon, 1999