Pregnant women with SARS‐CoV‐2 infection are at higher risk of death and pneumonia: propensity score matched analysis of a nationwide prospective cohort (COV19Mx)
Open Access
- 15 December 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Vol. 57 (2), 224-231
- https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.23575
Abstract
Background Limited, unmatched data reported low complication rates in pregnant women with COVID‐19. This study compared COVID‐19‐related outcomes in pregnant women versus non‐pregnant women after adjusting for potential risk factors for severe outcomes. Methods Data were obtained from the COVID‐19 National Data Registry of Mexico, which is an ongoing prospective cohort of people of any age with clinically suspected SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and admitted to 475 monitoring hospitals. This study included pregnant and non‐pregnant women of reproductive age (15–49 y) with COVID‐19 confirmed by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. To adjust for underlying risk factors, propensity score matching was conducted for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, smoking, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, obesity, diabetes, and age. The primary outcome was death. Secondary outcomes were pneumonia, intubation, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Results The initial sample comprised of 5183 pregnant and 175,908 non‐pregnant COVID‐19 patients. The crude (unmatched) rates of death, pneumonia, intubation, and ICU admission in pregnant and non‐pregnant women were 1.5% vs. 1.5%, 9.9% vs. 6.5%, 8.1% vs. 9.9%, 13.0% vs. 6.9%, respectively. After propensity score matching (5183 pregnant‐ and 5183 non‐pregnant matched women), pregnant women had higher odds of death (odds ratio [OR] 1·65, 95% CI 1·30–2.09), pneumonia (OR 1·99, 95% CI 1·81–2·19) and ICU admission (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1·86–2·71) than non‐pregnant women, but similar odds of intubation (OR 0·93, 95% CI 0·70–1·25). Conclusions After adjusting for background demographic and medical factors, pregnancy is a risk factor for death, intubation and ICU admission in SARS‐CoV‐2–infected women of reproductive age.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Are propensity scores really superior to standard multivariable analysis?Contemporary Clinical Trials, 2011
- An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational StudiesMultivariate Behavioral Research, 2011
- A Tutorial and Case Study in Propensity Score Analysis: An Application to Estimating the Effect of In-Hospital Smoking Cessation Counseling on MortalityMultivariate Behavioral Research, 2011
- MatchIt: Nonparametric Preprocessing for Parametric Causal InferenceJournal of Statistical Software, 2011
- The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studiesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2008
- A critical appraisal of propensity‐score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003Statistics in Medicine, 2007
- The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studiesPreventive Medicine, 2007
- A case‐controlled study comparing clinical course and outcomes of pregnant and non‐pregnant women with severe acute respiratory syndromeBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2004
- Pregnancy and perinatal outcomes of women with severe acute respiratory syndromeAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2004
- The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effectsBiometrika, 1983