Publish or be damned? The fate of abstracts presented at the International Continence Society Meeting 2003†
- 24 January 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Neurourology and Urodynamics
- Vol. 26 (2), 154-157
- https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20391
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reporting of trials presented in conference abstracts needs to be improvedJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2006
- Delay in Final Publication Following Abstract Presentation: American College of Veterinary Anesthesiologists Annual MeetingJournal of Veterinary Medical Education, 2006
- Publication of Surgical Abstracts in Full Text: A Retrospective Cohort StudyThe Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2006
- From presentation to publication: the natural history of orthopaedic abstracts in the United KingdomPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,2006
- Late publication of randomized trials presented as abstracts at ICS meetingsNeurourology and Urodynamics, 2006
- Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authorsBMJ, 2005
- Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized TrialsJAMA, 2004
- Full publication of abstracts of randomised controlled trials published at International Continence Society meetings'†Neurourology and Urodynamics, 2004
- Under-reporting of clinical trials is unethicalThe Lancet, 2003
- Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical JournalsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1997