Urban runoff modelling uncertainty: Comparison among Bayesian and pseudo-Bayesian methods
- 30 September 2009
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Environmental Modelling & Software
- Vol. 24 (9), 1100-1111
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.03.003
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparing uncertainty analysis techniques for a SWAT application to the Chaohe Basin in ChinaJournal of Hydrology, 2008
- Event based uncertainty assessment in urban drainage modelling, applying the GLUE methodologyJournal of Hydrology, 2008
- So just why would a modeller choose to be incoherent?Journal of Hydrology, 2008
- Towards a Bayesian total error analysis of conceptual rainfall-runoff models: Characterising model error using storm-dependent parametersJournal of Hydrology, 2006
- Application of MCMC–GSA model calibration method to urban runoff quality modelingReliability Engineering & System Safety, 2006
- Hydrological forecasting uncertainty assessment: Incoherence of the GLUE methodologyJournal of Hydrology, 2006
- The effect of complexity on parameter sensitivity and model uncertainty in river water quality modellingEcological Modelling, 2006
- Uncertainty assessment and analysis of the calibrated parameter values of an urban storm water quality modelJournal of Hydrology, 1998
- Sewer sediment production and transport modelling: A literature reviewJournal of Hydraulic Research, 1993
- River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principlesJournal of Hydrology, 1970