Estimating Minimal Clinically Important Differences of Upper-Extremity Measures Early After Stroke
Top Cited Papers
- 30 September 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
- Vol. 89 (9), 1693-1700
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2008.02.022
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Interpreting clinically significant changes in patient‐reported outcomesCancer, 2007
- Sensorimotor Impairments and Reaching Performance in Subjects With Poststroke Hemiparesis During the First Few Months of RecoveryPTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal, 2007
- Participant Perception of Recovery as Criterion to Establish Importance of Improvement for Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Outcome Measures: A Preliminary StudyPTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal, 2007
- Issues in selecting outcome measures to assess functional recovery after strokeNeuroRX, 2006
- Reliability and Validity of the Upper-Extremity Motor Activity Log-14 for Measuring Real-World Arm UseStroke, 2005
- Costs of Stroke Care according to Handicap Levels and Stroke SubtypesCerebrovascular Diseases, 2003
- Management Patterns and Costs of Acute Ischemic StrokeStroke, 2000
- Forced Use of the Upper Extremity in Chronic Stroke PatientsStroke, 1999
- Measurement of health status: Ascertaining the minimal clinically important differenceControlled Clinical Trials, 1989
- A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and researchInternational Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 1981