Treating Patients With EGFR-Sensitizing Mutations: First Line or Second Line—Is There a Difference?
- 10 March 2013
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 31 (8), 1081-1088
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2012.43.0652
Abstract
First-line epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR TKI) is a standard treatment for patients with activating EGFR mutations. Six randomized studies have demonstrated consistent improvement in tumor response rate and progression-free survival over platinum-based combination chemotherapy. The only reason to consider EGFR TKI as second-line therapy is that none of the six comparative studies has shown improvement in overall survival, which can be explained by the high proportion of patients from the chemotherapy arm crossing over to the EGFR TKI arm on progression. It is true that patients with EGFR mutations may benefit from second-line EGFR TKI therapy, but we cannot conclude that the benefit is either equal to or inferior to first-line EGFR TKI therapy. To date, there are no direct comparative data between first- and second-line EGFR TKI in patients with activating EGFR mutations. Tumor response rates to second-line EGFR TKI have been inconsistent, which could potentially be explained by the impact of first-line chemotherapy on the abundance of tumor cells with activating EGFR mutations. However, numerous arguments, including assurance on drug exposure, improvement in quality of life, better tolerance by patients with poor performance status, and deferral of whole-brain radiation therapy for patients with brain metastasis, support the general application of first-line EGFR TKI.Keywords
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for European patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (EURTAC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trialThe Lancet Oncology, 2012
- Erlotinib versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 studyThe Lancet Oncology, 2011
- EGFR mutation status and survival after diagnosis of brain metastasis in nonsmall cell lung cancerNeuro-Oncology, 2010
- Gefitinib or Carboplatin–Paclitaxel in Pulmonary AdenocarcinomaThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Multicentre prospective phase II trial of gefitinib for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations: results of the West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group trial (WJTOG0403)British Journal of Cancer, 2008
- Gefitinib for non-small-cell lung cancer patients with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations screened by peptide nucleic acid-locked nucleic acid PCR clampBritish Journal of Cancer, 2006
- Molecular Predictors of Outcome With Gefitinib in a Phase III Placebo-Controlled Study in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2006
- Erlotinib in Lung Cancer — Molecular and Clinical Predictors of OutcomeThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- EGFR Mutations in Lung Cancer: Correlation with Clinical Response to Gefitinib TherapyScience, 2004
- Activating Mutations in the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Underlying Responsiveness of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer to GefitinibThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2004