THE WATER RELATIONS AND IRRIGATION REQUIREMENTS OF SUGAR CANE (SACCHARUM OFFICINARUM): A REVIEW
- 26 January 2011
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Experimental Agriculture
- Vol. 47 (1), 1-25
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0014479710000645
Abstract
SUMMARY: The results of research on the water relations and irrigation needs of sugar cane are collated and summarized in an attempt to link fundamental studies on crop physiology to irrigation practices. Background information on the centres of production of sugar cane is followed by reviews of (1) crop development, including roots; (2) plant water relations; (3) crop water requirements; (4) water productivity; (5) irrigation systems and (6) irrigation scheduling. The majority of the recent research published in the international literature has been conducted in Australia and southern Africa. Leaf/stem extension is a more sensitive indicator of the onset of water stress than stomatal conductance or photosynthesis. Possible mechanisms by which cultivars differ in their responses to drought have been described. Roots extend in depth at rates of 5–18 mm d−1 reaching maximum depths of > 4 m in ca. 300 d providing there are no physical restrictions. The Penman-Monteith equation and the USWB Class A pan both give good estimates of reference crop evapotranspiration (ETo). The corresponding values for the crop coefficient (Kc) are 0.4 (initial stage), 1.25 (peak season) and 0.75 (drying off phase). On an annual basis, the total water-use (ETc) is in the range 1100–1800 mm, with peak daily rates of 6–15 mm d−1. There is a linear relationship between cane/sucrose yields and actual evapotranspiration (ETc) over the season, with slopes of about 100 (cane) and 13 (sugar) kg (ha mm)−1 (but variable). Water stress during tillering need not result in a loss in yield because of compensatory growth on re-watering. Water can be withheld prior to harvest for periods of time up to the equivalent of twice the depth of available water in the root zone. As alternatives to traditional furrow irrigation, drag-line sprinklers and centre pivots have several advantages, such as allowing the application of small quantities of water at frequent intervals. Drip irrigation should only be contemplated when there are well-organized management systems in place. Methods for scheduling irrigation are summarized and the reasons for their limited uptake considered. In conclusion, the ‘drivers for change’, including the need for improved environmental protection, influencing technology choice if irrigated sugar cane production is to be sustainable are summarized.Keywords
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- A preliminary assessment of climate change impacts on sugarcane in SwazilandAgricultural Systems, 2010
- Growth of the whole root system for a plant crop of sugarcane under rainfed and irrigated environments in BrazilField Crops Research, 2009
- Impacts of irrigation return flows on the quality of the receiving waters: A case of sugarcane irrigated fields at the Royal Swaziland Sugar Corporation (RSSC) in the Mbuluzi River Basin (Swaziland)Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 2006
- ?Dripping with success?: the challenges of an irrigation redevelopment projectIrrigation and Drainage, 2003
- DRIP-FERTIGATION – A MEANS FOR REDUCING FERTILIZER NITROGEN TO SUGARCANEExperimental Agriculture, 1999
- A new technique for determining the thermal parameters of phenological development in sugarcane, including suboptimum and supra-optimum temperature regimesAgricultural and Forest Meteorology, 1998
- Evaluation of sugarcane evapotranspiration from water table data in the everglades agricultural areaAgricultural Water Management, 1995
- Experience with approximately 600 hectare of drip irrigation at Simunye Sugar Estate, SwazilandAgricultural Water Management, 1990
- Stomatal control of transpiration from a developing sugarcane canopyPlant, Cell & Environment, 1989
- Response of Drip‐Irrigated Sugarcane to Drought Stress1Agronomy Journal, 1982