Uterine artery embolization vs hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: 5-year outcome from the randomized EMMY trial
- 31 August 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 203 (2), 105.e1-105.e13
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.01.049
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids: Treatment with Uterine Artery Embolization or Hysterectomy—Results from the Randomized Clinical Embolisation versus Hysterectomy (EMMY) TrialRadiology, 2008
- Loss of ovarian reserve after uterine artery embolization: a randomized comparison with hysterectomyHuman Reproduction, 2007
- Uterine artery embolization versus hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: 2 years’ outcome from the randomized EMMY trialAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2007
- Uterine-Artery Embolization versus Surgery for Symptomatic Uterine FibroidsThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Can we achieve international agreement on terminologies and definitions used to describe abnormalities of menstrual bleeding? †Human Reproduction, 2007
- Uterine fibroid embolization versus myomectomy in women wishing to preserve fertility: Preliminary results of a randomized controlled trialEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2006
- Uterine artery embolization versus hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids (EMMY trial): Peri- and postprocedural results from a randomized controlled trialAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2005
- Uterine Fibroids: Uterine Artery Embolization versus Abdominal Hysterectomy for Treatment—A Prospective, Randomized, and Controlled Clinical TrialRadiology, 2003
- EuroQol: the current state of playHealth Policy, 1996
- Assessment of menstrual blood loss using a pictorial chartBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1990