Head-to-head comparison of accuracy of a rapid point-of-care HIV test with oral versus whole-blood specimens: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- 1 May 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in The Lancet Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 12 (5), 373-380
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(11)70368-1
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- HIV Self-testing and the Missing LinkagePLoS Medicine, 2011
- Low Specificities of HIV Diagnostic Tests Caused by Trypanosoma brucei gambiense Sleeping SicknessJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2010
- Validation of Rapid HIV Antibody Tests in 5 African CountriesJournal of the International Association of Physicians in AIDS Care, 2010
- False Positive Rate of Rapid Oral Fluid HIV Tests Increases as Kits Near Expiration DatePLOS ONE, 2009
- HIV Testing in a High‐Incidence Population: Is Antibody Testing Alone Good Enough?Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2009
- Field Evaluation of Diagnostic Accuracy of an Oral Fluid Rapid Test for HIV, Tested at Point-of-Service Sites in Rural ZimbabweAIDS Patient Care and STDs, 2009
- Impact of Round-the-Clock, Rapid Oral Fluid HIV Testing of Women in Labor in Rural IndiaPLoS Medicine, 2008
- Alternative Algorithms for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection Diagnosis Using Tests That Are Licensed in the United StatesJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2008
- Evaluation of Diagnostic Accuracy, Feasibility and Client Preference for Rapid Oral Fluid-Based Diagnosis of HIV Infection in Rural IndiaPLOS ONE, 2007