Randomized Comparison Between Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy
- 1 May 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Journal of Sexual Medicine
- Vol. 8 (5), 1503-1512
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02215.x
Abstract
Lack of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compare pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) with robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) is an important gap of the literature related to the surgical treatment of the clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa)Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 1: specimen handlingLaboratory Investigation, 2011
- Time Course of Recovery of Erectile Function After Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy: Does Anyone Recover After 2 Years?The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 2010
- Clinical Stage T1c Prostate Cancer: Evaluation with Endorectal MR Imaging and MR Spectroscopic ImagingRadiology, 2009
- Functional and Oncologic Outcomes Comparing Interfascial and Intrafascial Nerve Sparing in Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical ProstatectomiesJournal of Endourology, 2009
- The Surgical Learning Curve for Prostate Cancer Control After Radical ProstatectomyJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2007
- The Correlation Between Erectile Function and Patient SatisfactionThe Journal of Sexual Medicine, 2007
- Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Critical Analysis of Surgical QualityEuropean Urology, 2006
- Twelve‐month self‐reported quality of life after retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective study with Rand 36‐Item Health Survey (Short Form‐36)BJU International, 2006
- Classification of Surgical ComplicationsAnnals of Surgery, 2004
- Defining sexual outcomes after treatment for localized prostate carcinomaCancer, 2002