Costs and coverage of reproductive health interventions in three rural refugee‐affected districts, Uganda
- 19 February 2007
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Tropical Medicine & International Health
- Vol. 12 (3), 459-469
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2006.01788.x
Abstract
The definitive version is available at www3.interscience.wiley.comBACKGROUND: Uganda has hosted an estimated 200,000 refugees in post-emergency phase settlements interspersed within host communities since 1990. However, refugee health service runs parallel to host in most refugee-affected districts. The process of integration of health services began in 1999. OBJECTIVE: To estimate and compare the costs and coverage of reproductive health (RH) interventions in refugee and host populations in three rural West Nile refugee-affected districts of Uganda. METHODS: Data on costs of RH interventions were collected through a survey in 38/116 (33%) health facilities (3 public hospitals and 35 health centres). Data on coverage of RH interventions were collected from all 116 health facilities in the three rural refugee-affected districts for 2 years, 2003 and 2004. RESULTS: The costs and coverage of RH interventions significantly varied between population categories and among levels of refugee and host health facilities. Per capita cost of health care is 2.7 times higher for the refugee than the host population (US$13.12 vs. US$4.85). The cost per RH intervention is higher in the refugee than in the host health system (US$3.02 vs. US$2.73). Significantly more refugees attend antenatal care [99.4% (95% CI, 97.5-100) vs. 53.5% (53.22-53.78); P < 0.0001]. The proportion of births in health facilities was significantly greater among refugees [37.3% (36.12-38.48) vs. 15.2% (15.01-15.39); P < 0.05]. Major obstetrical interventions for absolute maternal indications were significantly more frequent among refugees than the host population living in the same region [1.02% (0.79-1.25) vs. 0.85% (0.80-0.90); P < 0.05]. CONCLUSIONS: Our study has shown higher costs and coverage in refugee than host health services. The findings suggest policy recommendations for improving the capacity, financing, organization and the performance of host health system in the refugee-affected settingsKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Integrating refugee and host health services in West Nile districts, UgandaHealth Policy and Planning, 2005
- Postemergency health services for refugee and host populations in Uganda, 1999–2002The Lancet, 2004
- The importance of refugee-host relations: Guinea 1990–2003The Lancet, 2003
- Costs of maternal health care services in three anglophone African countriesThe International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 2003
- Ensuring the Reproductive Rights of Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons: Legal and Policy IssuesInternational Family Planning Perspectives, 2000
- Monitoring unmet obstetric need at district level in MoroccoTropical Medicine & International Health, 1998
- Effects of a refugee-assistance programme on host population in Guinea as measured by obstetric interventionsThe Lancet, 1998
- A cost comparison of approaches to sexually transmitted disease treatment in MalawiHealth Policy and Planning, 1998
- The Role of the Zairian Health Services in the Rwandan Refugee CrisisDisasters, 1995
- The impact of refugees on the health status and health services of host communities: Compounding bad with worse?Disasters, 1985