Classification of Complications: Is the Clavien-Dindo Classification the Gold Standard?
- 31 August 2012
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Elsevier BV in European Urology
- Vol. 62 (2), 256-258
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.04.028
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Classification and Detection of Errors in Minimally Invasive SurgeryJournal of Endourology, 2011
- Voiding Cystourethrogram—Are Our Protocols the Same?Journal of Urology, 2011
- The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study: Indications, Complications, and Outcomes in 5803 PatientsJournal of Endourology, 2011
- Complications in 2200 Consecutive Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomies: Standardised Evaluation and Analysis of Learning CurvesEuropean Urology, 2010
- Do Patients With Classic Bladder Exstrophy Have Fecal Incontinence? A Web-based StudyUrology, 2010
- Prospective Evaluation With Standardised Criteria for Postoperative Complications After Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical ProstatectomyEuropean Urology, 2010
- Comprehensive Standardized Report of Complications of Retropubic and Laparoscopic Radical ProstatectomyEuropean Urology, 2010
- Human error, not communication and systems, underlies surgical complicationsSurgery, 2008
- Evaluation of critical incidents in general surgeryBritish Journal of Surgery, 2008
- Identification and reduction of surgical error using simulationMinimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies, 2005