Elective Induction of Labor at Term Compared With Expectant Management
- 1 October 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Vol. 122 (4), 761-769
- https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0b013e3182a6a4d0
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To test the association of elective induction of labor at term compared with expectant management and maternal and neonatal outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of all deliveries without prior cesarean delivery in California in 2006 using linked hospital discharge and vital statistics data. We compared elective induction at each term gestational age (37–40 weeks) as defined by The Joint Commission with expectant management in vertex, nonanomalous, singleton deliveries. We used multivariable logistic regression to test the association of elective induction and cesarean delivery, operative vaginal delivery, maternal third- or fourth-degree lacerations, perinatal death, neonatal intensive care unit admission, respiratory distress, shoulder dystocia, hyperbilirubinemia, and macrosomia (birth weight greater than 4,000 g) at each gestational week, stratified by parity. RESULTS: The cesarean delivery rate was 16%, perinatal mortality was 0.2%, and neonatal intensive care unit admission was 6.2% (N=362,154). The odds of cesarean delivery were lower among women with elective induction compared with expectant management across all gestational ages and parity (37 weeks [odds ratio (OR) 0.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34–0.57], 38 weeks [OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.38–0.50], 39 weeks [OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.41–0.52], 40 weeks [OR 0.57, CI 0.50–0.65]). Elective induction was not associated with increased odds of severe lacerations, operative vaginal delivery, perinatal death, neonatal intensive care unit admission, respiratory distress, shoulder dystocia, or macrosomia at any term gestational age. Elective induction was associated with increased odds of hyperbilirubinemia at 37 and 38 weeks of gestation and shoulder dystocia at 39 weeks of gestation. CONCLUSION: Elective induction of labor is associated with decreased odds of cesarean delivery when compared with expectant management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IIKeywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Induction of labor compared to expectant management in low-risk women and associated perinatal outcomesAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2012
- Term Labor Induction Compared With Expectant ManagementObstetrics & Gynecology, 2010
- Menstrual versus clinical estimate of gestational age dating in the United States: temporal trends and variability in indices of perinatal outcomesPaediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 2007
- Induction of labor and cesarean delivery by gestational ageAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2006
- Comparison of Labor Progression Between Induced and Noninduced Multiparous WomenObstetrics & Gynecology, 2006
- The reporting of pre-existing maternal medical conditions and complications of pregnancy on birth certificates and in hospital discharge dataAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2005
- Labor Progression and Risk of Cesarean Delivery in Electively Induced NulliparasObstetrics & Gynecology, 2005
- Estimating the Relative Risk in Cohort Studies and Clinical Trials of Common OutcomesAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2003
- Outcome after elective labor induction in nulliparous women: A matched cohort studyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2002
- Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous womenObstetrics & Gynecology, 1999