Ecosystem-based fisheries management requires a change to the selective fishing philosophy
- 30 April 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
- Vol. 107 (21), 9485-9489
- https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0912771107
Abstract
Globally, many fish species are overexploited, and many stocks have collapsed. This crisis, along with increasing concerns over flow-on effects on ecosystems, has caused a reevaluation of traditional fisheries management practices, and a new ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM) paradigm has emerged. As part of this approach, selective fishing is widely encouraged in the belief that nonselective fishing has many adverse impacts. In particular, incidental bycatch is seen as wasteful and a negative feature of fishing, and methods to reduce bycatch are implemented in many fisheries. However, recent advances in fishery science and ecology suggest that a selective approach may also result in undesirable impacts both to fisheries and marine ecosystems. Selective fishing applies one or more of the “6-S” selections: species, stock, size, sex, season, and space. However, selective fishing alters biodiversity, which in turn changes ecosystem functioning and may affect fisheries production, hindering rather than helping achieve the goals of EBFM. We argue here that a “balanced exploitation” approach might alleviate many of the ecological effects of fishing by avoiding intensive removal of particular components of the ecosystem, while still supporting sustainable fisheries. This concept may require reducing exploitation rates on certain target species or groups to protect vulnerable components of the ecosystem. Benefits to society could be maintained or even increased because a greater proportion of the entire suite of harvested species is used.Keywords
This publication has 55 references indexed in Scilit:
- ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Implications of fisheries‐induced evolution for stock rebuilding and recoveryEvolutionary Applications, 2009
- Initial community evenness favours functionality under selective stressNature, 2009
- Human predators outpace other agents of trait change in the wildProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009
- Destabilized fish stocksNature, 2008
- Consequences of sexual selection for fisheries‐induced evolution: an exploratory analysisEvolutionary Applications, 2008
- Evolutionary response to size-selective mortality in an exploited fish populationProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2007
- Defining success in fisheries and conflicts in objectivesMarine Policy, 2006
- DID TRAWLING ON THE BROOD STOCK CONTRIBUTE TO THE COLLAPSE OF ALASKA'S KING CRAB?Ecological Applications, 2005
- Balancing exploitation and conservation of the eastern Scotian Shelf ecosystem: application of a 4D ecosystem exploitation indexICES Journal of Marine Science, 2005
- Decision Analysis of a Large-Scale Fishing Experiment Designed to Test for a Genetic Effect of Size-Selective Fishing on British Columbia Pink Salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha)Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1992