Spatial and annual variation to define the normal range of biological endpoints: An example with biomarkers in perch
Open Access
- 9 July 2010
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
- Vol. 29 (11), 2616-2624
- https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.300
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of long‐term biomarker data from perch (Perca fluviatilis) in the Baltic sea suggests increasing exposure to environmental pollutantsEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2009
- EXPERIENCES FROM A BIOMARKER STUDY ON FARMED RAINBOW TROUT (ONCORHYNCHUS MYKISS) USED FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING IN A SWEDISH RIVEREnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2009
- Analyses of perch (Perca fluviatilis) bile suggest increasing exposure to PAHs and other pollutants in a reference area on the Swedish Baltic coastPublished by Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) ,2008
- Long-term monitoring of the health status of female perch (Perca fluviatilis) in the Baltic Sea shows decreased gonad weight and increased hepatic EROD activityAquatic Toxicology, 2006
- The effect of different holding conditions for environmental monitoring with caged rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)Published by Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) ,2006
- Fish bioaccumulation and biomarkers in environmental risk assessment: a reviewEnvironmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, 2002
- The Insignificance of Statistical Significance TestingThe Journal of Wildlife Management, 1999
- Using the normal range as a criterion for ecological significance in environmental monitoring and assessmentÉcoscience, 1998
- Power Analysis for the NOEC: What is the Probability of Detecting Small Toxic Effects on Three Different Species using the Appropriate Standardized Test Protocols?Ecotoxicology, 1998
- Detection of Environmental Impacts: Natural Variability, Effect Size, and Power AnalysisEcological Applications, 1994