Why are Total Knee Arthroplasties Being Revised?
Top Cited Papers
- 30 September 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in The Journal of Arthroplasty
- Vol. 28 (8), 120-121
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.04.051
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reason for Revision Influences Early Patient Outcomes After Aseptic Knee RevisionClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2012
- Risk of Subsequent Revision after Primary and Revision Total Joint ArthroplastyClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2010
- The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: Long-term Survivorship and Failure Modes of 1000 Cemented Condylar Total Knee ArthroplastiesClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2006
- Prevalence of Primary and Revision Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States From 1990 Through 2002Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) ,2005
- Functional outcome after total knee arthroplasty revisionThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2002
- Why Are Total Knee Arthroplasties Failing Today?Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2002
- Early Failures in Total Knee ArthroplastyClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2001
- Survivorship of Cemented Total Knee ArthroplastyClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1997
- Kinematic condylar total knee arthroplastyThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 1996