The Nature of the Controversy over Time-Symmetric Quantum Counterfactuals
- 1 January 2003
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Philosophy of Science
- Vol. 70 (1), 145-163
- https://doi.org/10.1086/367874
Abstract
It is proposed that the recent controversy over “time-symmetric quantum counterfactuals” (TSQCs), based on the Aharonov-Bergmann-Lebowitz Rule for measurements of pre- and post-selected systems, can be clarified by taking TSQCs to be counterfactuals with a specific type of compound antecedent. In that case, inconsistency proofs such as that of Sharp and Shanks (1993) are not applicable, and the main issue becomes not whether such statements are true, but whether they are nontrivial. The latter question is addressed and answered in the negative. Thus it is concluded that TSQCs, understood as counterfactuals with a compound antecedent, are true but only trivially so, and provide no new contingent information about specific quantum systems (except in special cases already identified in literature).Keywords
This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit:
- How to Ascertain the Values of Every Member of a Set of Observables that Cannot all Have ValuesPublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,1997
- How to ascertain the values of , , and of a spin-1/2 particlePhysical Review Letters, 1987