The Coordination of Leaf Photosynthesis Links C and N Fluxes in C3 Plant Species
Open Access
- 7 June 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 7 (6), e38345
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038345
Abstract
Photosynthetic capacity is one of the most sensitive parameters in vegetation models and its relationship to leaf nitrogen content links the carbon and nitrogen cycles. Process understanding for reliably predicting photosynthetic capacity is still missing. To advance this understanding we have tested across C3 plant species the coordination hypothesis, which assumes nitrogen allocation to photosynthetic processes such that photosynthesis tends to be co-limited by ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP) carboxylation and regeneration. The coordination hypothesis yields an analytical solution to predict photosynthetic capacity and calculate area-based leaf nitrogen content (Na). The resulting model linking leaf photosynthesis, stomata conductance and nitrogen investment provides testable hypotheses about the physiological regulation of these processes. Based on a dataset of 293 observations for 31 species grown under a range of environmental conditions, we confirm the coordination hypothesis: under mean environmental conditions experienced by leaves during the preceding month, RuBP carboxylation equals RuBP regeneration. We identify three key parameters for photosynthetic coordination: specific leaf area and two photosynthetic traits (k3, which modulates N investment and is the ratio of RuBP carboxylation/oxygenation capacity ( ) to leaf photosynthetic N content (Npa); and Jfac, which modulates photosynthesis for a given k3 and is the ratio of RuBP regeneration capacity (Jmax) to ). With species-specific parameter values of SLA, k3 and Jfac, our leaf photosynthesis coordination model accounts for 93% of the total variance in Na across species and environmental conditions. A calibration by plant functional type of k3 and Jfac still leads to accurate model prediction of Na, while SLA calibration is essentially required at species level. Observed variations in k3 and Jfac are partly explained by environmental and phylogenetic constraints, while SLA variation is partly explained by phylogeny. These results open a new avenue for predicting photosynthetic capacity and leaf nitrogen content in vegetation models.Keywords
This publication has 62 references indexed in Scilit:
- TRY – a global database of plant traitsGlobal Change Biology, 2011
- A model of canopy photosynthesis incorporating protein distribution through the canopy and its acclimation to light, temperature and CO2Annals of Botany, 2010
- Dynamics of Light and Nitrogen Distribution during Grain Filling within Wheat CanopyPlant Physiology, 2008
- What have we learned from 15 years of free‐air CO2 enrichment (FACE)? A meta‐analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant production to rising CO2New Phytologist, 2004
- Allocation of nitrogen to cell walls decreases photosynthetic nitrogen‐use efficiencyFunctional Ecology, 2004
- The worldwide leaf economics spectrumNature, 2004
- In vivo temperature response functions of parameters required to model RuBP‐limited photosynthesisPlant, Cell & Environment, 2003
- Photosynthetic acclimation of plants to growth irradiance: the relative importance of specific leaf area and nitrogen partitioning in maximizing carbon gainPlant, Cell & Environment, 2001
- Photosynthesis and nitrogen relationships in leaves of C3 plantsOecologia, 1989
- A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 speciesPlanta, 1980