Learned Associability and Associative Change in Human Causal Learning
Open Access
- 1 February 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
- Vol. 56 (1b), 68-79
- https://doi.org/10.1080/02724990244000179
Abstract
The Mackintosh (1975) model of associative learning specifies that processing of both the cues presented on a trial and the outcome of that trial will interact to determine the amount of associative change undergone by a given cue. Experiments looking at the distribution of associative change among the elements of a reinforced compound in animal conditioning studies indicate that processing of the outcome of a trial does indeed influence associative change. The work reported here investigates the distribution of associative change among the elements of a reinforced compound in a human causal judgement paradigm, and it indicates that processing of the cues presented on a trial also plays a role in determining associative change (in terms of changes in the associability of cues as a result of experience). Taken in combination, these results provide good support for Mackintosh (1975) and the characterizations of both cue and outcome processing that it offers.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Toward a Unified Model of Attention in Associative LearningJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 2001
- Blocking and backward blocking involve learned inattentionPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2000
- A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli.Psychological Review, 1980
- A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement.Psychological Review, 1975