An ideological asymmetry in the diffusion of moralized content on social media among political leaders.
Open Access
- 1 October 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
- Vol. 148 (10), 1802-1813
- https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000532
Abstract
Online social networks constitute a major platform for the exchange of moral and political ideas, and political elites increasingly rely on social media platforms to communicate directly with the public. However, little is known about the processes that render some political elites more influential than others when it comes to online communication. Here, we gauge influence of political elites on social media by examining how message factors (characteristics of the communication) interact with source factors (characteristics of elites) to impact the diffusion of elites' messages through Twitter. We analyzed messages (N = 286,255) sent from federal politicians (presidential candidates. members of the Senate and House of Representatives) in the year leading up to the 2016 U.S. presidential election-a period in which Democrats and Republicans sought to maximize their influence over potential voters. Across all types of elites, we found a "moral contagion" effect: elites' use of moral-emotional language was robustly associated with increases in message diffusion. We also discovered an ideological asymmetry: conservative elites gained greater diffusion when using moral-emotional language compared to liberal elites, even when accounting for extremity of ideology and other source cues. Specific moral emotion expressions related to moral outrage-namely, moral anger and disgust-were impactful for elites across the political spectrum, whereas moral emotion expression related to religion and patriotism were more impactful for conservative elites. These findings help inform the scientific understanding of political propaganda in the digital age. and the antecedents of political polarization in American politics.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Science Foundation (SES-1349089; SES-1248077; SES-1248077-001)
- New York University
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Contextual sensitivity in scientific reproducibilityProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016
- Tweeting From Left to RightPsychological Science, 2015
- Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideologyBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 2014
- Election Forecasts With TwitterSocial Science Computer Review, 2010
- The Psychology of Moral ConvictionSocial and Personality Psychology Compass, 2010
- The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis MethodsJournal of Language and Social Psychology, 2009
- Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.Psychological Bulletin, 2003
- The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.Psychological Review, 2001
- Social Functions of Emotions at Four Levels of AnalysisCognition and Emotion, 1999
- A FUNCTIONALIST PERSPECTIVE ON THE NATURE OF EMOTION - COMMENTARY1994