Relation between social order and use of resources in small and large furnished cages for laying hens
- 1 September 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in British Poultry Science
- Vol. 49 (5), 516-524
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660802302203
Abstract
1. The objective was to determine the relation between social rank and use of resources in a small furnished cage with sufficient resources per hen (SF) and a commercial large one with less adequate allowance of facilities per hen (LF). 2. Ninety-two cross layers were used. At the age of 16 weeks, the hens were divided at random into two groups. There were 4 furnished cages with 5 birds per cage and 4 large furnished cages with 18 birds per cage. The dominance hierarchy was determined, in which highest, medium and lowest ranking hens in each cage were identified. Behaviour, use of facilities and physical conditions of these hens were measured (one in each rank category in SF, two in each in LF). 3. Dustbathing and litter scratching were more frequent in the high ranking hens than the medium and low ranked hens in LF, while no significant difference was found between them in SF. 4. No significant difference between SF and LF was found in use of nest boxes. However, pre-laying sitting tended to be less frequent in low ranking than medium and high ranking hens in LF (Social order × Cage design). In the nest box most of time was spent in pre-laying sitting by SF hens, LF high and medium ranked hens (average 94·9%). However, LF low ranking hens spent their time escaping (33·1%), pre-laying sitting (27·7%) standing (25·7%) and moving (13·5%) in the nest. 5. In the large furnished cages with less facilities per hen, high ranking hens may be expected to have priority using the dust bath. In contrast, low ranking hens rarely performed nesting behaviour fully, and spend more time using the nest box as a refuge than for laying.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Behavior, physiology, performance and physical condition of layers in conventional and large furnished cages in a hot environmentAnimal Science Journal, 2007
- Differences of behavior, use of resources and physical conditions between dominant and subordinate hens in furnished cagesAnimal Science Journal, 2007
- Evaluation of the effects of cage height and stocking density on the behaviour of laying hens in furnished cagesBritish Poultry Science, 2007
- Behavioral changes in laying hens after introduction to battery cages, furnished cages and an aviaryAnimal Science Journal, 2006
- Changes in feather condition in relation to feather pecking and aggressive behaviour in laying hensBritish Poultry Science, 1999
- Individual variation in prelaying behaviour and the incidence of floor eggsBritish Poultry Science, 1996
- The Edinburgh modified gage for laying hensBritish Poultry Science, 1995
- Comparative analysis of pre‐laying behaviour in battery cages and in three alternative systemsBritish Poultry Science, 1989
- Space needs of laying hensBritish Poultry Science, 1989
- Relationship between Aggressiveness and Egg Production in the Domestic HenNature, 1958