Measuring Bias and Uncertainty in Ideal Point Estimates via the Parametric Bootstrap
- 1 January 2004
- journal article
- website
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Political Analysis
- Vol. 12 (2), 105-127
- https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mph015
Abstract
Over the last 15 years a large amount of scholarship in legislative politics has used NOMINATE or other similar methods to construct measures of legislators' ideological locations. These measures are then used in subsequent analyses. Recent work in political methodology has focused on the pitfalls of using such estimates as variables in subsequent analysis without explicitly accounting for their uncertainty and possible bias (Herron and Shotts 2003, Political Analysis 11:44–64). This presents a problem for those employing NOMINATE scores because estimates of their unconditional sampling uncertainty or bias have until now been unavailable. In this paper, we present a method of forming unconditional standard error estimates and bias estimates for NOMINATE scores using the parametric bootstrap. Standard errors are estimated for the 90th U.S. Senate in two dimensions. Standard errors of first—dimension placements are in the 0.03 to 0.08 range. The results are compared with those obtained using the Markov chain Monte Carlo estimator of Clinton et al. (2002, Stanford University Working Paper). We also show how the bootstrap can be used to construct standard errors and confidence intervals for auxiliary quantities of interest such as ranks and the location of the median senator.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Geometry of Multidimensional Quadratic Utility in Models of Parliamentary Roll Call VotingPolitical Analysis, 2001
- Nonparametric Unfolding of Binary Choice DataPolitical Analysis, 2000
- Modeling Earnings Measurement Error: A Multiple Imputation ApproachThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 1996
- Bootstrap Statistical Inference: Examples and Evaluations for Political ScienceAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1996
- Comparing Committee and Floor PreferencesLegislative Studies Quarterly, 1994
- Bootstrapping Goodness-of-Fit Measures in Structural Equation ModelsSociological Methods & Research, 1992
- Patterns of Congressional VotingAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1991
- A Spatial Model for Legislative Roll Call AnalysisAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1985
- Maximum likelihood estimation of item response parameters when some responses are omittedPsychometrika, 1983
- A generalized solution of the orthogonal procrustes problemPsychometrika, 1966