Pneumatic Dilation versus Laparoscopic Heller's Myotomy for Idiopathic Achalasia
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 12 May 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 364 (19), 1807-1816
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1010502
Abstract
Many experts consider laparoscopic Heller's myotomy (LHM) to be superior to pneumatic dilation for the treatment of achalasia, and LHM is increasingly considered to be the treatment of choice for this disorder. We randomly assigned patients with newly diagnosed achalasia to pneumatic dilation or LHM with Dor's fundoplication. Symptoms, including weight loss, dysphagia, retrosternal pain, and regurgitation, were assessed with the use of the Eckardt score (which ranges from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating more pronounced symptoms). The primary outcome was therapeutic success (a drop in the Eckardt score to ≤3) at the yearly follow-up assessment. The secondary outcomes included the need for retreatment, pressure at the lower esophageal sphincter, esophageal emptying on a timed barium esophagogram, quality of life, and the rate of complications. A total of 201 patients were randomly assigned to pneumatic dilation (95 patients) or LHM (106). The mean follow-up time was 43 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 40 to 47). In an intention-to-treat analysis, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the primary outcome; the rate of therapeutic success with pneumatic dilation was 90% after 1 year of follow-up and 86% after 2 years, as compared with a rate with LHM of 93% after 1 year and 90% after 2 years (P=0.46). After 2 years of follow-up, there was no significant between-group difference in the pressure at the lower esophageal sphincter (LHM, 10 mm Hg [95% CI, 8.7 to 12]; pneumatic dilation, 12 mm Hg [95% CI, 9.7 to 14]; P=0.27); esophageal emptying, as assessed by the height of barium-contrast column (LHM, 1.9 cm [95% CI, 0 to 6.8]; pneumatic dilation, 3.7 cm [95% CI, 0 to 8.8]; P=0.21); or quality of life. Similar results were obtained in the per-protocol analysis. Perforation of the esophagus occurred in 4% of the patients during pneumatic dilation, whereas mucosal tears occurred in 12% during LHM. Abnormal exposure to esophageal acid was observed in 15% and 23% of the patients in the pneumatic-dilation and LHM groups, respectively (P=0.28). After 2 years of follow-up, LHM, as compared with pneumatic dilation, was not associated with superior rates of therapeutic success. (European Achalasia Trial Netherlands Trial Register number, NTR37, and Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN56304564.)Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- AchalasiaBest Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology, 2007
- The laparoscopic Heller-Dor operation remains an effective treatment for esophageal achalasia at a minimum 6-year follow-upSurgical Endoscopy, 2005
- 100 Consecutive Minimally Invasive Heller Myotomies: Lessons LearnedAnnals of Surgery, 2002
- Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy and Dor Fundoplication for AchalasiaArchives of Surgery, 2001
- Clinical Presentation and Complications of AchalasiaGastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America, 2001
- Endoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the Los Angeles classificationGut, 1999
- Timed barium swallow: a simple technique for evaluating esophageal emptying in patients with achalasia.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1997
- Development of an EORTC questionnaire module to be used in quality of life assessment for patients with oesophageal cancerEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1996
- Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care.BMJ, 1992
- Achalasia: Current evaluation and therapyThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1991