Practice variation in the management of distal deep vein thrombosis in primary vs. secondary cares: A clinical practice survey
- 1 September 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Thrombosis Research
- Vol. 136 (3), 526-530
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2015.06.013
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Incidence and predictors of venous thromboembolism recurrence after a first isolated distal deep vein thrombosisJournal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2014
- How I treat isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (IDDVT)Blood, 2014
- Impact of anatomical location of lower limb venous thrombus on the risk of subsequent cancerThrombosis and Haemostasis, 2014
- The controversy of managing calf vein thrombosisJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2012
- Risk factors and early outcomes of patients with symptomatic distal vs. proximal deep-vein thrombosisCurrent Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine, 2011
- Comparison of the clinical history of symptomatic isolated muscular calf vein thrombosis versus deep calf vein thrombosisJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2010
- Risk of Deep Vein Thrombosis Following a Single Negative Whole-Leg Compression UltrasoundJAMA, 2010
- Comparison of the clinical history of symptomatic isolated distal deep‐vein thrombosis vs. proximal deep vein thrombosis in 11 086 patientsJournal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2009
- Is it worth diagnosing and treating distal deep vein thrombosis? NoJournal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2007
- Distal DVT: worth diagnosing? YesJournal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2007