Improvements in Speed-Based Gait Classifications Are Meaningful
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 July 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Stroke
- Vol. 38 (7), 2096-2100
- https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.106.475921
Abstract
Background and Purpose— Gait velocity is a powerful indicator of function and prognosis after stroke. Gait velocity can be stratified into clinically meaningful functional ambulation classes, such as household ambulation (0.8 m/s). The purpose of the current study was to determine whether changes in velocity-based community ambulation classification were related to clinically meaningful changes in stroke-related function and quality of life. Methods— In subacute stroke survivors with mild to moderate deficits who participated in a randomized clinical trial of stroke rehabilitation and had a baseline gait velocity of 0.8 m/s or less, we assessed the effect of success versus failure to achieve a transition to the next class on function and quality of life according to domains of the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS). Results— Of 64 eligible participants, 19 were initially household ambulators, and 12 of them (68%) transitioned to limited community ambulation, whereas of 45 initially limited community ambulators, 17 (38%) became full community ambulators. Function and quality-of-life SIS scores after treatment were significantly higher among survivors who achieved a favorable transition compared with those who did not. Among household ambulators, those who transitioned to limited or full community ambulation had significantly better SIS scores in mobility ( P =0.0299) and participation ( P =0.0277). Among limited community ambulators, those who achieved the transition to full community ambulatory status had significantly better scores in SIS participation ( P =0.0085). Conclusions— A gait velocity gain that results in a transition to a higher class of ambulation results in better function and quality of life, especially for household ambulators. Household ambulators possibly had more severe stroke deficits, reducing the risk of “ceiling” effects in SIS-measured activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living. Outcome assessment based on transitions within a mobility classification scheme that is rooted in gait velocity yields potentially meaningful indicators of clinical benefit. Outcomes should be selected that are clinically meaningful for all levels of severity.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measurement of Community Ambulation After StrokeStroke, 2005
- Community ambulation after stroke: how important and obtainable is it and what measures appear predictive?Archives Of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2004
- Randomized Clinical Trial of Therapeutic Exercise in Subacute StrokeStroke, 2003
- Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: the stroke impact scale11No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.Archives Of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2003
- Physical Performance Measures in the Clinical SettingJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2003
- Stroke Impact Scale-16Neurology, 2003
- Care for Older PeopleInternal Medicine, 2003
- Could Stroke Trials Be Missing Important Treatment Effects?Cerebrovascular Diseases, 2002
- Deficit and change in gait velocity during rehabilitation after strokeArchives Of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 1996
- Hemiparetic gait following stroke. Part II: Recovery and physical therapyGait & Posture, 1996