The Letter and the Spirit: A Unified Theory of Originalism
Preprint
- 5 October 2017
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier BV in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
The concept of constitutional construction is of central importance to originalist theory but is both underdeveloped and controversial among originalists. Some object that its apparent open-endedness undermines the constraining virtues of originalism and exposes citizens to arbitrary judicial power. In this Article, we respond to this challenge by presenting an originalist theory of constitutional construction that can guide and constrain judicial activity within the “construction zone.” When combined with an originalist theory of constitutional interpretation, our approach yields a unified theory of originalism. Our theory draws upon a familiar common-law concept long used in contract law to handle the problem of opportunistic abuse of contractual discretion: the duty of good-faith performance. We contend that judges who take an oath to “support this Constitution” enter into a fiduciary relationship with private citizens — a relationship characterized by discretionary powers in the hands of officials and a corresponding vulnerability in the citizenry. As fiduciaries, judges are morally and legally bound to follow the instructions given them in “this Constitution” in good faith. This means that judges engaging in constitutional construction or implementation must seek to give legal effect to both the Constitution’s “letter” (its original public meaning) and its “spirit” (the original function or purpose of the particular clauses and general structure of the text.) Therefore, when interpretation of original meaning is not sufficient to resolve a controversy, judges have a duty of good-faith originalist construction. Good-faith construction consists in (a) accurately identifying the spirit — or original function” — of the relevant constitutional provision at the time it was enacted and (b) devising implementing rules that are calculated to give effect to both the letter and the spirit of the text in the case at hand and in future cases. Conversely, bad-faith construction consists in opportunistically using the discretion inherent in implementing the Constitution to evade either its original letter or spirit (or both) in pursuit of their own extralegal preferences.This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Account of “The case of the prisoners” (Caton v. Commonwealth) by Edmund Pendleton, Tuesday, 29 October 1782 [pendedVH0020416a1d]Published by Electronic Enlightenment Project ,2023
- Alexander Hamilton: The Federalist, No. 9, 1787 4Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd ,2017
- Spirit and Letter – Letter and Spirit in Schleiermacher's Speeches ‘On Religion’Published by Bloomsbury Academic ,2014
- The Origins of the Privileges or Immunities Clause, Part II: John Bingham and the Second Draft of the Fourteenth AmendmentSSRN Electronic Journal, 2010
- McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)Published by SAGE Publications ,2010
- Quail recovery plan for the City of San Francisco : final /Published by Smithsonian Institution ,2004
- Lincoln Club of Orange County v. City of Irvine, 292 F. 3d 934 (9th Cir. 2002)Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, 2002
- Securities Laws. Rule 10b-5. Seventh Circuit Holds That Causation Can Be Established without Reliance. Eckstein v. Balcor Film Investors, 8 F.3d 1121 (7th Cir. 1993)Harvard Law Review, 1994
- 8790, 1815-12-18, SCHEPMAN, med. doctor † WALOP (Jakob Johannes), id. †Published by Brill ,1970
- 12: The Wickard RebellionPublished by Columbia University Press ,1955