Race/Ethnicity and Success in Academic Medicine: Findings From a Longitudinal Multi-Institutional Study
- 1 April 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Academic Medicine
- Vol. 93 (4), 616-622
- https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000001968
Abstract
Purpose To understand differences in productivity, advancement, retention, satisfaction, and compensation comparing underrepresented medical (URM) faculty with other faculty at multiple institutions. Method A 17-year follow-up was conducted of the National Faculty Survey, a random sample from 24 U.S. medical schools, oversampled for URM faculty. The authors examined academic productivity, advancement, retention, satisfaction, and compensation, comparing white, URM, and non-URM faculty. Retention, productivity, and advancement data were obtained from public sources for nonrespondents. Covariates included gender, specialty, time distribution, and years in academia. Negative binomial regression was used for count data, logistic regression for binary outcomes, and linear regression for continuous outcomes. Results In productivity analyses, advancement, and retention, 1,270 participants were included; 604 participants responded to the compensation and satisfaction survey. Response rates were lower for African American (26%) and Hispanic faculty (39%) than white faculty (52%, P < .0001). URM faculty had lower rates of peer-reviewed publications (relative number 0.64; 95% CI: 0.51, 0.79), promotion to professor (OR = 0.53; CI: 0.30, 0.93), and retention in academic medicine (OR = 0.49; CI: 0.32, 0.75). No differences were identified in federal grant acquisition, senior leadership roles, career satisfaction, or compensation between URM and white faculty. Conclusions URM and white faculty had similar career satisfaction, grant support, leadership, and compensation; URM faculty had fewer publications and were less likely to be promoted and retained in academic careers. Successful retention of URM faculty requires comprehensive institutional commitment to changing the academic climate and deliberative programming to support productivity and advancement.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Experience of Minority Faculty Who Are Underrepresented in Medicine, at 26 Representative U.S. Medical SchoolsAcademic Medicine, 2013
- Why Are a Quarter of Faculty Considering Leaving Academic Medicine? A Study of Their Perceptions of Institutional Culture and Intentions to Leave at 26 Representative U.S. Medical SchoolsAcademic Medicine, 2012
- Institutional Variation in the Promotion of Racial/Ethnic Minority Faculty at US Medical SchoolsAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2012
- Effects of Incentives and Prenotification on Response Rates and Costs in a National Web Survey of PhysiciansEvaluation & the Health Professions, 2011
- Race, Disadvantage and Faculty Experiences in Academic MedicineJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2010
- How Do Race And Sex Affect The Earnings Of Primary Care Physicians?Health Affairs, 2009
- Minority Faculty Voices on Diversity in Academic Medicine: Perspectives From One SchoolAcademic Medicine, 2008
- Mentoring Partnerships for Minority Faculty and Graduate Students in Mental Health Services ResearchAcademic Psychiatry, 2006
- Faculty self-reported experience with racial and ethnic discrimination in academic medicineJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2004
- Educational Benefits of Diversity in Medical SchoolAcademic Medicine, 2003