Sterilization and sanitizing of 3D-printed personal protective equipment using polypropylene and a Single Wall design
Open Access
- 11 June 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in 3D Printing in Medicine
- Vol. 7 (1), 1-10
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-021-00106-8
Abstract
Background: The emergence of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic during the fall of 2019 and into the spring of 2020 has led to an increased demand of disposable N95 respirators and other types of personal protective equipment (PPE) as a way to prevent virus spread and help ensure the safety of healthcare workers. The sudden demand led to rapid modification, development, and dissemination of 3D printed PPE. The goal of this study was to determine the inherent sterility and re-sterilizing ability of 3D printed PPE in order to provide sterile equipment to the healthcare field and the general public.Methods: Samples of polylactic acid (PLA), thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) (infill-based designs) and polypropylene (single-wall hollow design) were 3D printed. Samples were inoculated withE. colifor 24 h and then sanitized using various chemical solutions or heat-based methods. The samples were then incubated for 24- or 72-h in sterile LB medium at 37°C, and bacterial growth was measured by optical density at 600nm. Statistical analysis was conducted using GraphPad Prism v8.2.1.Results: Significant bacterial growth was observed in all PLA and TPU based samples following re-sterilization, regardless of the methods used when compared to controls (p < 0.05). The single-walled hollow polypropylene design was not only sterile following printing, but was also able to undergo re-sanitization following bacterial inoculation, with no significant bacterial growth (p > 0.05) observed regardless of sanitization method used.Conclusion: The cost effectiveness, ease of sanitization, and reusability of 3D printed PPE, using our novel single-walled polypropylene design can help meet increased demands of PPE for healthcare workers and the general public that are needed to help decrease the viral transmission of the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. 3D printing also has the potential to lead to the creation and production of other sterile material items for the healthcare industry in the future. The ability to re-sterilize 3D printed PPE, as our design shows, would also contribute less to the increase in biomedical waste (BMW) being experienced by COVID-19.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- 3D-Printing to Address COVID-19 Testing Supply ShortagesLaboratory Medicine, 2020
- Role of respirators in controlling the spread of novel coronavirus (COVID‐19) amongst dental healthcare providers: a reviewInternational Endodontic Journal, 2020
- Adapting re‐usable elastomeric respirators to utilise anaesthesia circuit filters using a 3D‐printed adaptor ‐ a potential alternative to address N95 shortages during the COVID‐19 pandemicAnaesthesia, 2020
- Personal protective equipment for preventing highly infectious diseases due to exposure to contaminated body fluids in healthcare staffEmergencias, 2020
- COVID-19 and the role of 3D printing in medicine3D Printing in Medicine, 2020
- Applications of 3D Printing Technology to Address COVID-19–Related Supply ShortagesThe American Journal of Medicine, 2020
- Rapid prototyping and clinical testing of a reusable face shield for health care workers responding to the COVID-19 pandemicPublished by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory ,2020
- Rational use of face masks in the COVID-19 pandemicThe Lancet Respiratory Medicine, 2020
- Benchmarking the in Vitro Toxicity and Chemical Composition of Plastic Consumer ProductsEnvironmental Science & Technology, 2019
- On the intrinsic sterility of 3D printingPeerJ, 2016