How Biased Are Indirect Comparisons, Particularly When Comparisons Are Made Over Time in Controlled Trials?
- 1 November 2008
- journal article
- other
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Drug Information Journal
- Vol. 42 (6), 625-633
- https://doi.org/10.1177/009286150804200610
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sample sizes for clinical trials with Normal dataStatistics in Medicine, 2004
- Indirect comparison meta-analysis of aspirin therapy after coronary surgeryBMJ, 2003
- Noninferiority Analysis in Active Controlled Clinical TrialsPublished by Informa UK Limited ,2003
- Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- TACT method for non‐inferiority testing in active controlled trialsStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Non‐inferiority trials: design concepts and issues – the encounters of academic consultants in statisticsStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Some fundamental issues with non‐inferiority testing in active controlled trialsStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Placebo Response in Studies of Major DepressionJAMA, 2002
- Statistical Methods for Comparison to Placebo in Active-Control TrialsDrug Information Journal, 2001
- Trials to assess equivalence: the importance of rigorous methodsBMJ, 1996