Mortality associated with withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy for patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a Canadian multicentre cohort study
Top Cited Papers
- 29 August 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by CMA Impact Inc. in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
- Vol. 183 (14), 1581-1588
- https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.101786
Abstract
Background: Severe traumatic brain injury often leads to death from withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy, although prognosis is difficult to determine. Methods: To evaluate variation in mortality following the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy and hospital mortality in patients with critical illness and severe traumatic brain injury, we conducted a two-year multicentre retrospective cohort study in six Canadian level-one trauma centres. The effect of centre on hospital mortality and withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy was evaluated using multivariable logistic regression adjusted for baseline patient-level covariates (sex, age, pupillary reactivity and score on the Glasgow coma scale). Results: We randomly selected 720 patients with traumatic brain injury for our study. The overall hospital mortality among these patients was 228/720 (31.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 28.4%–35.2%) and ranged from 10.8% to 44.2% across centres (χ2 test for overall difference, p < 0.001). Most deaths (70.2% [160/228], 95% CI 63.9%–75.7%) were associated with withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy, ranging from 45.0% (18/40) to 86.8% (46/53) (χ2 test for overall difference, p < 0.001) across centres. Adjusted odd ratios (ORs) for the effect of centre on hospital mortality ranged from 0.61 to 1.55 (p < 0.001). The incidence of withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy varied by centre, with ORs ranging from 0.42 to 2.40 (p = 0.001). About one half of deaths that occurred following the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies happened within the first three days of care. Interpretation: We observed significant variation in mortality across centres. This may be explained in part by regional variations in physician, family or community approaches to the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy. Considering the high proportion of early deaths associated with the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy and the limited accuracy of current prognostic indicators, caution should be used regarding early withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy following severe traumatic brain injury.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- A New Method for Evaluating Trauma Centre Outcome PerformanceAnnals of Surgery, 2010
- How Patients Die After Intracerebral HemorrhageNeurocritical Care, 2009
- Management of Brain-Injured Patients by an Evidence-Based Medicine Protocol Improves Outcomes and Decreases Hospital ChargesThe Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 2004
- Withdrawal of Mechanical Ventilation in Anticipation of Death in the Intensive Care UnitThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- End-of-Life Practices in European Intensive Care UnitsJAMA, 2003
- Trauma in the Elderly: Intensive Care Unit Resource Use and OutcomeThe Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 2002
- Management of severe head injury: Institutional variations in care and effect on outcome*Critical Care Medicine, 2002
- Withholding/Withdrawal of Life Support in Trauma Patients: Is There an Age Bias?The American Surgeon, 2002
- Withdrawal of support in intracerebral hemorrhage may lead to self-fulfilling propheciesNeurology, 2001
- Research Evidence on the Validity of Risk-Adjusted Mortality Rate as a Measure of Hospital Quality of CareMedical Care Research and Review, 1998