Shale Oil Production Performance from a Stimulated Reservoir Volume
- 30 October 2011
- conference paper
- conference paper
- Published by Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)
Abstract
The horizontal well with multiple transverse fractures has proven to be an effective strategy for shale gas reservoir exploitation. Some operators are successfully producing shale oil using the same strategy. Due to its higher viscosity and eventual 2-phase flow conditions when the formation pressure drops below the oil bubble point pressure, shale oil is limited to lower recovery efficiency than shale gas. However, the recently discovered Eagle Ford formations is significantly overpressured, and initial formation pressures is well above the bubble point pressure in the oil window. This, coupled with successful hydraulic fracturing methodologies, is leading to commercial wells. This study evaluates the recovery potential for oil produced both above and below the bubble point pressure from very low permeability unconventional oil formations.Relative permeability behavior, including the critical gas saturation, is likely to be quite different in created fractures from that of the shale matrix, and technology for laboratory multiphase flow measurements has not been developed for such low absolute permeability values as are found in shale formations. Further, propent embedment and expected multi-phase flow in the created hydraulic fractures can lead to actual values of fracture conductivity in the created fractures order of magnitude lower than the values reported in the laboratory.As with shale gas, high recovery in shale oil wells will require that created hydraulic fractures are spaced close enough to result in interfracture interference during the time the well is on production. This study investigates the role of the fracture spacing, fracture conductivity, fracture half-length, critical gas saturation, flowing bottom-hole pressure and matrix permeability in the well economics and the ultimate recovery efficiency considering flow both above and below the bubble point pressure and using known properties of successful shale oil plays. Simulations show that results are strongly dependent on assumed relative permeability behavior, and sensitivity studies provide considerable insight about the long term production behavior than can be expected in these wells.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rate-Normalized Pressure Analysis for Determination of Shale Gas Well PerformancePublished by Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) ,2011
- Reservoir Modeling in Shale-Gas ReservoirsSPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2010
- From Oil-Prone Source Rock to Gas-Producing Shale Reservoir – Geologic and Petrophysical Characterization of Unconventional Shale-Gas ReservoirsPublished by Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) ,2010
- Accurate Simulation of Non-Darcy Flow in Stimulated Fractured Shale ReservoirsPublished by Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) ,2010
- What Is Stimulated Reservoir Volume?SPE Production & Operations, 2010
- The Relationship Between Fracture Complexity, Reservoir Properties, and Fracture Treatment DesignPublished by Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) ,2008
- A Practical Use of Shale Petrophysics for Stimulation Design Optimization: All Shale Plays Are Not Clones of the Barnett ShalePublished by Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) ,2008
- Integration of Microseismic Fracture Mapping Results With Numerical Fracture Network Production Modeling in the Barnett ShalePublished by Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) ,2006
- The Increasing Role of Unconventional Reservoirs in the Future of the Oil and Gas BusinessJournal of Petroleum Technology, 2003
- Characterization of Eagle Ford ShaleEngineering Geology, 2002