Phase Offset Calculation for Airborne InSAR DEM Generation Without Corner Reflectors
- 13 November 2014
- journal article
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) in IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
- Vol. 53 (5), 2713-2726
- https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2014.2363937
Abstract
Digital elevation model (DEM) generation through interferometric processing of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data requires the calculation of a constant phase offset present in the unwrapped interferograms. This operation is usually carried out by exploiting the external information provided by GPS measurements in correspondence of corner reflectors (CRs) properly deployed over the illuminated area. This is, however, expensive in terms of cost and time. Moreover, deployment of CRs along with the corresponding in situ GPS measurements can be difficult (if not impossible) in unfriendly areas or in natural disaster scenarios. To circumvent these limitations, we address in this work the estimation of the required phase offset by exploiting a low-accuracy external DEM, without using CRs. More specifically, a two-step approach is proposed. The first step exploits the synthetic phase computed by means of the external DEM and represents a straightforward extension of the procedure that is usually applied in the presence of CRs. Subsequently, in order to refine the achieved solution, a second step is introduced. It is based on a least squares approach that properly exploits the difference between the available low-accuracy DEM and the interferometric DEM generated by means of the phase offset value roughly estimated through the first step. The presented approach is very easy to implement and allows us to achieve an accurate and fast estimate of the needed phase offset, even in the presence of an external DEM affected by a vertical bias and/or a planar shift. The algorithm performances improve in the presence of a large variation of the look angle, as it generally happens in airborne systems. On the other side, the effectiveness of the algorithm may be impaired by the possible presence of artifacts in the unwrapped interferograms, such as those due to the residual motion errors typical of repeat-pass airborne SAR scenarios. Accordingly, the proposed solution is particularly suitable for single-pass interferometric airborne SAR systems, as demonstrated through the presented experimental results achieved on real data.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Azimuth-to-Frequency Mapping in Airborne SAR Data Corrupted by Uncompensated Motion ErrorsIEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2013
- Comparison of Topography- and Aperture-Dependent Motion Compensation Algorithms for Airborne SARIEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2007
- Verification of the Vertical Error in C-Band SRTM DEM Using ICESat and Landsat-7, Otter Tail County, MNIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2006
- Accuracy assessment of the processed SRTM-based elevation data by CGIAR using field data from USA and Thailand and its relation to the terrain characteristicsRemote Sensing of Environment, 2006
- Validation of SRTM Elevations Over Vegetated and Non-vegetated Terrain Using Medium Footprint LidarPhotogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 2006
- ASTER DEM performanceIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2005
- Validation of the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission height dataIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2005
- The shuttle radar topography mission—a new class of digital elevation models acquired by spaceborne radarISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2003
- Trajectory deviations in airborne SAR: analysis and compensationIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 1999
- Airborne SAR processing of highly squinted data using a chirp scaling approach with integrated motion compensationIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1994