A comparison of surgical pulmonary embolectomy and catheter-directed lysis for life-threatening pulmonary emboli
- 13 December 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery
- Vol. 30 (3), 388-393
- https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivz288
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patients with life-threatening pulmonary emboli (PE) have traditionally been treated with anticoagulation alone, yet emerging data suggest that more aggressive therapy may improve short-term outcomes. The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes between catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDL) and surgical pulmonary embolectomy (SPE) in the treatment of life-threatening PE. METHODS A retrospective single-centre observational study was conducted for patients who underwent SPE or CDL at a single US academic centre. Preprocedural and postprocedural echocardiographic data were collected. Unadjusted regression models were constructed to assess the significance of the between-group postoperative differences. RESULTS A total of 126 patients suffered a life-threatening PE during the study period [60 SPE (47.6%), 66 CDL 52.4%]. Ten (24.4%) SPE patients and 10 (15.2%) CDL patients had massive PEs marked by preprocedural hypotension. Six (10.0%) SPE patients and 4 (6.0%) CDL patients suffered a preprocedure cardiac arrest (P = 0.41). In-hospital mortality rate was 3.3% (2) for SPE, and 3.0% (2) for CDL (P = 0.99). SPE patients were more likely to require prolonged ventilation (15.0% vs 1.5%, P = 0.01). No significant differences were found in other major complications. At baseline echocardiography, 76.9% of SPE patients and 56.9% of CDL patients had moderate or severe right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. Both treatment groups showed marked and durable improvement in echocardiographic markers of RV function from baseline at midterm follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Both SPE and CDL can be applied to well-selected high-risk patients with low rates of morbidity and mortality. Further research is necessary to delineate which patients would benefit most from either SPE or CDL following a life-threatening PE.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Stratification, and Natural History of Pulmonary EmbolismTechniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 2017
- Midterm benefits of surgical pulmonary embolectomy for acute pulmonary embolus on right ventricular functionThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2016
- Pulmonary Embolism Response to Fragmentation, Embolectomy, and Catheter Thrombolysis (PERFECT)Chest, 2015
- 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolismEuropean Heart Journal, 2014
- Fibrinolysis for Patients with Intermediate-Risk Pulmonary EmbolismNew England Journal of Medicine, 2014
- Nationwide outcomes of surgical embolectomy for acute pulmonary embolismThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2013
- Management of Massive and Submassive Pulmonary Embolism, Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis, and Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary HypertensionCirculation, 2011
- Catheter-directed Therapy for the Treatment of Massive Pulmonary Embolism: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Modern TechniquesJournal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 2009
- Pulmonary Embolism Mortality in the United States, 1979-1998Archives of Internal Medicine, 2003
- Acute pulmonary embolism: clinical outcomes in the International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry (ICOPER)The Lancet, 1999