Assessing the Importance of Tiebout Sorting: Local Heterogeneity from 1850 to 1990
- 1 November 2003
- journal article
- Published by American Economic Association in The American Economic Review
- Vol. 93 (5), 1648-1677
- https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803322655482
Abstract
This paper argues that long-run trends in geographic segregation are inconsistent with models where residential choice depends solely on local public goods (the Tiebout hypothesis). We develop an extension of the Tiebout model that predicts as mobility costs fall, the heterogeneity across communities of individual public good preferences and of public good provision must (weakly) increase. Given the secular decline in mobility costs, these predictions can be evaluated using historical data. We find decreasing heterogeneity in policies and proxies for preferences across (i) a sample of U.S. municipalities (1870–1990); (ii) all Boston-area municipalities (1870–1990); and (iii) all U.S. counties (1850–1990).Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Interjurisdictional Sorting and Majority Rule: An Empirical AnalysisEconometrica, 2001
- Participation in Heterogeneous Communities*The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2000
- Estimating Equilibrium Models of Local JurisdictionsJournal of Political Economy, 1999
- Local Property and State Income Taxes: The Role of Interjurisdictional Competition and CollusionJournal of Political Economy, 1997
- Keeping People Out: Income Distribution, Zoning, and the Quality of Public EducationInternational Economic Review, 1997
- Social Mobility and Redistributive PoliticsThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1995
- Tiebout : A Survey of the Empirical LiteratureUrban Studies, 1994
- The Dimensions of Residential SegregationSocial Forces, 1988
- Bureaucrats Versus Voters: On the Political Economy of Resource Allocation by Direct DemocracyThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1979
- The Religious Switcher in the United StatesAmerican Sociological Review, 1979