The merit of routine cord blood pH measurement at birth
- 1 January 1999
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH in jpme
- Vol. 27 (3), 158-65
- https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm.1999.021
Abstract
We searched the literature for mean values of arterial cord blood pH at birth and their lower limits of statistical normality. An arterial cord blood pH, correctly sampled, measured, validated, and interpreted, provides the most objective and sensitive index for fetal hypoxemia during labor. We advise to sample both artery and vein from a clamped segment of the cord within 30 minutes after birth. In accordance with physiological and statistical evidence, it is proposed to classify arterial cord blood pH in three categories: normal (when > 7.11), abnormal (when < 6.99), and borderline (7.00-7.11). An abnormal pH indicates that the fetus was in a state of biochemical decompensation at birth. Disadvantages of routine measurement include extra work load and the lack of a universally agreed definition of normal or abnormal pH. The major advantage of routine measurement is to provide care-givers with immediate feedback on their care during childbirth and an opportunity to learn from that feedback.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Umbilical cord blood acid-base values in uncomplicated termvaginal breech deliveriesActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1998
- Reliability of individual umbilical artery pH measurementsjpme, 1997
- Questioning the Practice of Routine Umbilical Cord Blood pH Sampling at DeliveryThe Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 1993
- Measurement of umbilical cord blood gases; effects of delays in collection and analysisJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1992
- Anmerkungen zur pH-Metrie im NabelschnurblutGeburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 1991
- Umbilical Cord Blood Gases for Term Healthy NewbornsAmerican Journal of Perinatology, 1990
- Perinatal brain damage: predictive value of metabolic acidosis and the Apgar score.BMJ, 1988
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986
- The reliability of the result of the umbilical cord pHjpme, 1983
- Short communicationjpme, 1975