Bravo Catheter-Free pH Monitoring: Normal Values, Concordance, Optimal Diagnostic Thresholds, and Accuracy
- 31 January 2009
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
- Vol. 7 (1), 60-67
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2008.08.020
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of the Bravotm Wireless and Digitrappertm Catheter-Based pH Monitoring Systems for Measuring Esophageal Acid ExposureThe American Journal of Gastroenterology, 2005
- Acid reflux event detection using the Bravo wireless versus the Slimline catheter pH systems: why are the numbers so different?Gut, 2005
- Wireless oesophageal pH monitoring: Feasibility, safety and normal values in healthy subjectsScandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 2005
- Ambulatory 24-hour Esophageal pH MonitoringJournal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 2003
- Biology of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Pathophysiology Relating to Medical and Surgical TreatmentAnnual Review of Medicine, 1999
- Effect of Ambulatory 24-Hour Esophageal pH Monitoring on Reflux-Provoking ActivitiesDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 1999
- Dyspepsia and dyspepsia subgroups: A population-based studyGastroenterology, 1992
- The lower esophageal sphincter in health and diseaseThe American Journal of Surgery, 1988
- Development of the 24-Hour Intraesophageal pH Monitoring Composite Scoring SystemJournal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 1986
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986