Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer Using a Nationwide Database in Japan
Top Cited Papers
- 21 February 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Annals of Surgical Oncology
- Vol. 24 (7), 1821-1827
- https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5808-4
Abstract
This study aimed to compare short-term outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) with those of open esophagectomy (OE) for thoracic esophageal cancer using a nationwide Japanese database. Overall, 9584 patients with thoracic esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy at 864 hospitals in 2011–2012 were evaluated. We performed one-to-one matching between the MIE and OE groups on the basis of estimated propensity scores for each patient. After propensity score matching, operative time was significantly longer in the MIE group (n = 3515) than in the OE group (n = 3515) [526 ± 149 vs. 461 ± 156 min, p < 0.001], whereas blood loss was markedly less in the MIE group than in the OE group (442 ± 612l vs. 608 ± 591 ml, p < 0.001). The populations of patients who required more than 48 h of postoperative respiratory ventilation was significantly less in the MIE group than in the OE group (8.9 vs. 10.9%, p = 0.006); however, reoperation rate within 30 days was significantly higher in the MIE group than in the OE group (7.0 vs. 5.3%, p = 0.004). There were no significant differences between the MIE and OE groups in 30-day mortality rates (0.9 vs. 1.1%) and operative mortality rates (2.5 vs. 2.8%, respectively). MIE was comparable with conventional OE in terms of short-term outcome after esophagectomy. It was particularly beneficial in reducing postoperative respiratory complications, but may be associated with higher reoperation rates.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Current status of minimally invasive esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancerGeneral Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2013
- Effectiveness of combined thoracoscopic–laparoscopic esophagectomy: comparison of postoperative complications and midterm oncological outcomes in patients with esophageal cancerSurgical Endoscopy, 2011
- Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysisSurgical Endoscopy, 2010
- Selective three-field lymphadenectomy for thoracic esophageal squamous carcinomaDiseases of the Esophagus, 2007
- Comparison of the Outcomes Between Open and Minimally Invasive EsophagectomyAnnals of Surgery, 2007
- Postoperative pulmonary complications are associated with worse short‐ and long‐term outcomes after extended esophagectomyJournal of Surgical Oncology, 2004
- A Prospective Randomized Trial of Extended Cervical and Superior Mediastinal Lymphadenectomy for Carcinoma of the Thoracic EsophagusThe American Journal of Surgery, 1998
- Thoracoscopic en bloc total esophagectomy with radical mediastinal lymphadenectomyThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1996
- Mortality and Morbidity Rates, Postoperative Course, Quality of Life, and Prognosis After Extended Radical Lymphadenectomy for Esophageal GancerAnnals of Surgery, 1995