Using reference data on quality of life—the importance of adjusting for age and gender, exemplified by the EORTC QLQ-C30 (+3)
- 1 August 1998
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in European Journal Of Cancer
- Vol. 34 (9), 1381-1389
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-8049(98)00136-1
Abstract
Interpretation of health related quality of life (HRQOL) results in cancer patients is facilitated by knowledge of the levels of HRQOL in the general population. However, direct comparisons can be misleading unless age and gender are considered. We demonstrate the derivation of age- and gender-specific 'expected' values from population reference values by means of simple calculations. This survey included 3000 randomly selected Norwegians above 18 years of age who received the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30 (+3) by mail. 1965 responses from 2,892 eligible persons (68%) were received. The population was divided into six disease groups based on self-reported health problems. The observed mean scale scores of the different groups deviated greatly from those obtained in the general population. The score for physical function, for example, was 72 for cancer patients and ranged from 73.3 to 82.5 in other disease groups, as opposed to 89.9 in the general population and 98.9 in those with no health problems. The range for one of the quality of life (QOL) scales was 57.7 to 84.7 compared with 73.7 in the general population. Expected mean scores for the patient groups were computed from the reference values, based on the concept of equivalence of age and gender. The differences between the observed mean scores and the reference values were strongly mediated by this method. The expected scores for physical function then ranged from 83.3 to 93.1 and from 70.3 to 75 for the QOL scale. The impact of age and gender on the reference data from the EORTC QLQ-C30 (+3) obtained in a general population shows that these variables must be considered when interpreting data on HRQOL for cancer patients. The demonstration of how to generate mean values which are adjusted according to the age and gender distribution of a population should increase the usefulness of this questionnaire among clinicians.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Health-related quality of life in the general Norwegian population assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality-of-Life Questionnaire: the QLQ=C30 (+ 3).Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1998
- Quality of life of Danish women: Population-based norms for the EORTC QLQ-C30Quality of Life Research, 1997
- The SF36 health survey questionnaire: an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS?BMJ, 1993
- Short form 36 (SF36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age.BMJ, 1993
- The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A Quality-of-Life Instrument for Use in International Clinical Trials in OncologyJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1993
- The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1993
- Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care.BMJ, 1992
- Measuring psychological and physical distress in cancer patients: structure and application of the Rotterdam Symptom ChecklistBritish Journal of Cancer, 1990
- Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: the Functional Living Index-Cancer: development and validation.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1984
- The Sickness Impact Profile: Development and Final Revision of a Health Status MeasureMedical Care, 1981