The impact of the two-week wait rule on the diagnosis and management of bladder cancer in a single UK institution
Open Access
- 1 January 2010
- journal article
- Published by Royal College of Surgeons of England in The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England
- Vol. 92 (1), 46-50
- https://doi.org/10.1308/003588410x12518836440207
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of the 2-week wait rule on patient waiting times for the diagnosis and treatment of bladder cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data reporting the waiting times from diagnosis to treatment for 100 consecutive patients newly diagnosed with bladder cancer immediately before and after the implementation of the 2-week wait rule were compared. The data were collected both prospectively and retrospectively from cancer multidisciplinary team meeting files and patient records. Various steps of the patient pathway were analysed including waiting times from referral to consultation as well as time to investigation and first treatment. Data were also analysed based upon tumour stage/grade and whether referrals were made on an urgent or routine basis. RESULTS One hundred newly diagnosed patients with bladder cancer in each group covered a period of 4–5 years (1997–2001 and 2001–2006). Following the introduction of the 2-week wait rule, there was a 47.6% reduction in the time from referral to first consultation with a specialist (42 days vs 22 days; P < 0.001). The time between first investigation and treatment has not reduced significantly. We also found that, despite the introduction of the 2-week wait rule, only 42% of the patients were diagnosed with bladder cancer using this pathway. Patients referred as ‘routine’ waited longer to be seen in hospital although there was no significant delay in receiving treatment. CONCLUSIONS The introduction of the 2-week wait rule has significantly reduced the time patients with bladder cancer wait for their first consultation with a specialist. However, there is no significant change in the time between first consultation and treatment.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Referral patterns, cancer diagnoses, and waiting times after introduction of two week wait rule for breast cancer: prospective cohort studyBMJ, 2007
- The 2-week wait for suspected cancer: time for a rethink?Published by Hindawi Limited ,2005
- Two week wait for suspected cancer: milestone or millstone?International Journal of Clinical Practice, 2005
- The two-week-wait cancer initiative in urology: useful modernization?Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2004
- Survival Rates after Radical Cystectomy according to Tumor Stage of Bladder Carcinoma at First PresentationUrologia Internationalis, 2004
- A prospective audit of the implementation of the 2-week rule for assessment of suspected urological cancersThe Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2003
- Delay and survival in bladder cancerBJU International, 2002
- The Results of Routine Evaluation of Adult Patients with Haematuria analysed according to Referral Form Information with 2-year Follow-upScandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, 2001
- The changing pattern of mortality and morbidity from radical cystectomyBJU International, 2000
- A retrospective study of the investigation and management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer in the South West RegionBritish Journal of Urology, 1996