Eye tracker data quality
- 28 March 2012
- conference paper
- conference paper
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Abstract
Data quality is essential to the validity of research results and to the quality of gaze interaction. We argue that the lack of standard measures for eye data quality makes several aspects of manufacturing and using eye trackers, as well as researching eye movements and vision, more difficult than necessary. Uncertainty regarding the comparability of research results is a considerable impediment to progress in the field. In this paper, we illustrate why data quality matters and review previous work on how eye data quality has been measured and reported. The goal is to achieve a common understanding of what data quality is and how it can be defined, measured, evaluated, and reported.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Introduction to Eye and Gaze TrackersPublished by IGI Global ,2012
- Effects of pupil size on recorded gaze position: a live comparison of two eyetracking systemsJournal of Vision, 2011
- Systematic influence of gaze position on pupil size measurement: analysis and correctionBehavior Research Methods, 2011
- Standardization of Automated Analyses of Oculomotor Fixation and Saccadic BehaviorsIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 2010
- An adaptive algorithm for fixation, saccade, and glissade detection in eyetracking dataBehavior Research Methods, 2010
- The incomplete fixation measurePublished by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ,2008
- Cleaning up systematic error in eye-tracking data by using required fixation locationsBehavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 2002
- Identifying fixations and saccades in eye-tracking protocolsPublished by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ,2000
- Blinking and Mental LoadPsychological Reports, 1972
- A Mathematical Theory of CommunicationBell System Technical Journal, 1948