Do We Need an Economic Impact Study or a Cost-Benefit Analysis of a Sports Event?
- 1 June 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in European Sport Management Quarterly
- Vol. 5 (2), 133-142
- https://doi.org/10.1080/16184740500188789
Abstract
In this paper, we try to show, using a simple numerical example of a fictional international sports event, that there is a fundamental difference between what is generally called an economic impact study of a sports event and a cost-benefit analysis. The difference is important because an economic impact study does not yield any argument for the government to subsidize the event. Only a cost-benefit analysis can provide the necessary information.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Calculating the regional economic impact of the olympic gamesEuropean Sport Management Quarterly, 2004
- The Economics of Sports Facilities and Their CommunitiesJournal of Economic Perspectives, 2000
- Abuses of conventional impact studies in the artsThe European Journal of Cultural Policy, 1996
- Professional Sports as Catalysts for Metropolitan Economic DevelopmentJournal of Urban Affairs, 1996
- Economic Impact Analysis of Sports Facilities and Events: Eleven Sources of MisapplicationJournal of Sport Management, 1995
- Sport and Downtown Development Strategy If You Build It, Will Jobs Come?Journal of Urban Affairs, 1994
- The Impact of Stadium and Professional Sports on Metropolitan Area DevelopmentGrowth and Change, 1990
- A Discussion of Methods Employed in Analyzing the Impact of Short-Term Entertainment EventsJournal of Travel Research, 1980