Improved X-ray baggage screening sensitivity with ‘targetless’ search training
Open Access
- 14 April 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
- Vol. 6 (1), 1-20
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-021-00295-0
Abstract
When searching for a known target, mental representations of target features, or templates, guide attention towards matching objects and facilitate recognition. When only distractor features are known, distractor templates allow irrelevant objects to be recognised and attention to be shifted away. This is particularly true in X-ray baggage search, a challenging real-world visual search task with implications for public safety, where targets may be unknown, difficult to predict and concealed by an adversary, but distractors are typically benign and easier to identify. In the present study, we draw on basic principles of distractor suppression and rejection to investigate a counterintuitive ‘targetless’ approach to training baggage search. In a simulated X-ray baggage search task, we observed significant benefits to target detection sensitivity (d′) for targetless relative to target-based training, but no effects of performance-contingent rewards or the inclusion of superordinate semantic categories during training. The benefits of targetless search training were most apparent for stimuli involving less spatial overlap (occlusion), which likely represents the difficulty and greater individual variation involved in searching more visually complex images. Together, these results demonstrate the effectiveness of a counterintuitive targetless approach to training target detection in X-ray baggage search, based on basic principles of distractor suppression and rejection, with potential for use as a real-world training tool.Keywords
Funding Information
- Defence and Security Accelerator
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dual-target search for high and low prevalence X-ray threat targetsVisual Cognition, 2010
- Generalized “satisfaction of search”: Adverse influences on dual-target search accuracy.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2010
- Search for arbitrary objects in natural scenes is remarkably efficientJournal of Vision, 2008
- Generating stimuli for neuroscience using PsychoPyFrontiers in Neuroscience, 2008
- Rare Targets Are Rarely Missed in Correctable SearchPsychological Science, 2007
- PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in PythonJournal of Neuroscience Methods, 2007
- Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2007
- The perceptual and cognitive distractor-previewing effectJournal of Vision, 2004
- Visual Skills in Airport-Security ScreeningPsychological Science, 2004
- Understanding priming of color-singleton search: Roles of attention at encoding and “retrieval”Perception & Psychophysics, 2001